All that I can find quickly are in Russian so don’t know if they will be helpful for you. But simply put, in Stalingrad we’re going to have Mp-717(r) version, not Mp-41(r).
1 Like
I can read basic Russian, so they’ll do. But if the MP 41(r) is out of the question, I want to know one more thing (and I know it’s a very minor issue, but it would be one of those nice details): will it be named PPSh-41 (trophy) or MP 717(r)?
@1942786
With the upcoming weapons polish update,
Such as new visuals for weapons new animations and sounds, is here a chance your team is including the Lewis gun of the “Battle of Moscow” “Firepower” Bundle to finally adding the rotation animation for its ammo pan?
I am surprised for such iconic LMG that the ammo pan rotation animation was missing, it gives it a unrealistic feel, and since development had made clear its striving to authenticity, i am wondering why this is getting over looked, and or gets looked into.
Thanks for reading
1 Like
From a gameplay balance perspective, it’s really good. In theory. But in fact, since the ppsh change, nothing has changed. It didn’t become less p2w (it wasn’t anyway). Why? Because even so, a very large proportion of f2p players will not have a ppsh in the near future. Whether available or not. How many people are there now, say in Moscow? But anyway, how many people are running into high-end gear for any campaign? And how many of them were f2p players? And if what a few here are writing or guessing is true, by the time he gets it, the whole campaign could be a ghost town by then (hopefully not). In my experience, most players (if not just 2-3 real people on the team) don’t even run in the middle of campaigns. Not surprisingly, most only collect 1-2,000 points in a half-hour battle. Getting to level 24-25 in F2p is a lot of battle and time. And matchmaking wasn’t even mentioned.
Nice gesture from the developers. But only so that those who never have such a weapon may not cry.
Maybe even for the f2p player not to be sad the first day he sees what he can get (in theory) and what he can’t.
Changing mkbh / avt makes more sense. Although it is questionable how many people would use these on assaulters rather than ppsh. In a close-combat-oriented campaign (there will be open spaces for sure, but most of the capture points will be in a building). Maybe those who go with two guns …
1 Like
NO i hope they not do that!
But if they gonna do that than this has to be taken into account!
If they are limiting use of the FG42 to engi and the switch to assault on all campaigns,
Than also make the exception for AT squads, since you can have only 2 (if chosen in the level tree) and 4 with the main AT gunner squad, i have a assault squad setup with 2 AT gunners and since i did assemble it with the idea of assaulting i like them to have the full auto option rifle.
That aside, if they put the FG24 with the assault class than a ammo pool increasing is a must 20/20 is underwhelming especially for engi since they dond have the option for a secondary, if you wand to use the gun it only weakens you in terms of survival.
Forcing to use the large ammo pack is not a fare solution (in my opinion its another Nerf limiting you choices) most 6 squad engi use the large grande pack to counter tanks (alternative replacement for AT gunners) and blow up enemy fortifications.
As for the assault class in the campaigns where shotguns are present most make the secondary weapon upgrade choice in the leveling tree, (like i have my setup) denying the option for a large backpack slot, the reason why this is a limitation is that its NOT practical to use a double barrel shotgun as a main, due to the use limitations for close and tight spaces as intended.
If they not increase the ammo pool than its handicapping yourself even as the FG24 is superior to all the other SMG and engi rifle’s with a 20/20 ammo limit its a no go for me i stick with my max level MP40/ Beretta 1916 and gewehr 41.
Guys, no hate, no more forum wars pls. We dont need more temp forum bans : O
NO PAID MODE do campains like the ones before stop the game from dying ( i got 40 guys on my discord and 20-25 of them wont even play the game anymore)
lmfao
2 Likes
I hope pacific campaign will have the same business model as Stalingrad, just to laugh at reactions from you guys.
8 Likes
Why? 4 free campaigns and dlc campaigns afterward is how Df wants to monetize the game. Just ONE campaign is not for free and uninstall game already? Your discord dudes should get their medicines back.
6 Likes
GeneralBrus
A bit to late, he already aggressively is/was provoking,
Moderation wil notice his unreasonable bad attitude.
Resolves itself with time.
1 Like
Ehh…
Dont use shotgun then I guess.
I use 1 or 2 drilling in Tunisia… with big ammo bags (!) For the fun of it.
Granted, I’m a bit nuts…
2 Likes
But well you can use the FG on assaulters in France as Axis does not have shoties there.
1 Like
You mean charge $60 to even progress through the campaign? Because that how it was done in Berlin
2 Likes
CaptainSebekel
But that will undermine the idea of difers use of weapons,
and in my opinion its a limitation for the use of a situational weapon.
But if they going to do it the way as it seems to be going, than no problem for me i stick with my setup which i will deem to consider more efficient en beneficial for my load out’s.
They can do that?
I haven’t lvled much Normandy to be frank, it’s my least liked campaign. Planes rocket nukes and too many dday map and jumbos makes it “meh” for me 
My Alies Tunis setup is a Sterling SMG & pump shotgun combo! YHaaaoo.
Well… makea shotgun mainer then with a backpack or sth. like this?
Like Df is forcing you to not pick a shotgun…
Then why complaining in first place?
Seems… unlogical.
1 Like
Try the lanchester if you also use shotgun: Lanchester is more precise and easier to control which is what you need if the shotgun already fills the cqc role. Lanchester is a lazer.