If not historical accuracy try historical based

I had 7 levels with Japan and 5 with US, the maps were bad and most matches were unbalanced with one side stomping for months, it was mostly popular with victory farmers since the average match ended in about 10 minutes.

1 Like

Yeah, but Type 4 back then had extremely fast reload speed.
It was definitely the best semi rifle in the game.

And tbh, it suited open pacific maps way more than M2c.

Not really, the reload speed was 3.6s. It was indeed faster than similar guns that use 2 clip like Gewehr 41. But it is still slower than most other semi auto rifle, which have reload speed that are less than 3s.

No, it was way faster.

Maybe the speed up dual clip reload animation give you the illusion of being way faster.

1 Like

Nothing wrong with a little more History in Historically based battles, in a Historical WW2 Battle game.

3 Likes

Yeah, it’s possible I am just disillusioned but I really don’t believe so.

Normally we should have MG federov in moscow

Moscow’s progress before the merger was T28, so I didn’t have a chance to learn about it.

Weird… I never really encountered those and had problems with them. I dominated most matches.

well idk if you had crossplay turned off cause moscow was just there for soviets to farm bots and newbies for crossplay on. in general, soviets had ~25-30% more players than germans in moscow. situation for crossplay off was somewhat better for axis with only 15-20% more soviet players.

That’s real weird cuz my winrate of 70%+ and the fact I kept crossplay on is confusing.

The game sucks now