As the game has developed, the current five BR divisions are no longer suitable for the current situation, so I think it’s really necessary to add BRⅥ.
Specifically, it’s about upgrading fully automatic rifles, jet planes, King Tiger II tanks, and other suitable stuff to BR VI, while the remaining BR V weapons and vehicles can stay where they are without creating too big a gap with BR IV weapons.
This way, developers can continue to maintain their favorite+/ -1 rating.As for some people worrying that it will cause BR inflation like War Thunder, I think that’s impossible. Because Enlisted is set in the WWII era (su 9: really?),BRⅥ is already enough to put down these weapons that are already in the game and those that haven’t been added yet. there just aren’t that many things left that could surpass the top-tier weapons already in the game.
Adding BRⅥ, with the current weapons and vehicle data, can ease most of the current conflicts without needing major changes. Of course, developers will still need to do some further balancing.
1 Like
Just block BR V from BR IV. There’s about the same amount of players that play BR V as BR II, III and IV combined. Plus, we no longer have to worry about trying to balance semi autos with select fires and other game breaking weapons (in the context of other BRs).
4 Likes
No, I do not support the creation of a BR6, it’s far better to simply isolate BR5
3 Likes
Maybe try it for a month or two to see how it goes?
Will sadly never come…at least in a timely matter. It’s been 5 years already, if not more. They should’ve done it way back when the Steam and console release came out, since that’s when the most players joined. It’s been 2.5 years since then and still no move to make +/-0BR
2 Likes
tiny error
block br4 from br5 and br3
I was thinking about that while I was responding: “What if they added it for a month, just to see how the player base reacts?”
Believe me, bro, isolating a BRⅤ won’t solve any problems; if anything, it’ll just make BRⅣ and BRⅢ turn into the BRⅤ and BRⅣ of today.
1 Like
That’s going to happen regardless to any BR without ±0BR, adding a sixth BR won’t fix it either, and BR3 can take on BR4 quite well so isolating BR5 would be a good choice
1 Like
Don’t give in, don’t compromise. we all need to hold the line on our demands.
I was all for adding BR VI before, but now I see it’d just bring more problems. Honestly, the most realistic move is matchmaking isolation. Gaijin’s never budged on that, but with the game’s current output, isolation’s the only realistic option — it should at least start with BR IV–V.
yes br 1-2 2-3 4 5that way no one gets an unfair advantage and qtimes are not unduly increased
br3 stays the way it is br4 is the one that wants to seperate from br5
everyone who gets to fight a lower br has to fight a higher br
i think we need to ad a br4.5
is br4 3 comparable no
is the largest gap between br 4 5 yes
so i dont think we need a br6 i think we need to move br5 to br6 and add a real br5
Do you really not see the contradiction in your words?)
oh i do but there is no other way
we dont have the playerbase for -+0 br
if we keep moving its -+0
the only way to do that is to remove
join us, join japan, join germany, join ussr and make everyone choose join any faction
i refuse to allow the br4 crowd to backwards employ br-+0 and double q times
Since there’s no other way out, the top‑tier BR will be 4 
i agree, get rid of jets, king tanks, pershings, ferdinands, t20’s stg44, hybe44
dont threaten me with a giood time
br5 already feels more like korea then ww2