If i play the Germans in the Normandie, i don’t want to re-grind them for the Moscow campaign or the upcoming campagin since it’s pretty much the same. Won’t this make the German player count pretty low by the end? Or will games be filled with just AI?
Kind wish i could pick a nation and then stick with it, like why did they go this path? Is it just because of that extra cash?
Also this makes the map pool rather low in each campagin, and picking a new campagin = tedious grind.
Been playing for about five days now, Normandie and i do enjoy it but it’s getting a bit boring. It’s the weird combination of low map count and grind, not really thrilled to pick up another campagin.
no it’s because that each battle had different equipment used, like in moscow you aren’t going to see stg44s or tiger 2s because of the time period, with the only constancy between normandy and moscow is kar98k due that being the standard issue infantry weapons, mp40 because that was most effective SMG, and mg34 because that was used for tanks and infantry alike
It’s still something they will need to address unless they’re fine with most players sticking almost exclusively to a single faction of a single campaign considering how sparse soldier/equipment orders are.
I get the OP’s point, it does seem odd to grind out Axis in Moscow and then have to do it again in Normandy, but as has already been said, there are different units and weapons available in the different combat theatres.
Obviously Normandy had more french and European weapons available, while Moscow is the abundance of Russian and German arms and hopefully Tunisia will be mostly Italian and British weapons, with troops from both sides empires/ allies.
Berlin will hopefully also be all the last ditch volksweapons on the Reich while the Soviet Union will have their final load out of arms and shock troops. Hopefully we’ll see units from the shock armies and volksturm in this campaign, so it’s as much about the divisions as the weapons
they did it because your idea would give te Axis powers a massive advantage over the allied side - the Germans would get to build up Xp over 4 campaigns -0 taking totally maxed out squads into all their campaigns after hte first one, but the allied side can’t - except maybe Sov’s could from Moscow to Berlin.
there are different weapons available in different theaters
STG 44 SHOULD NOT BE IN MOSCOW IF IT’S UNLOCKED IN NORMANDY, HOWEVER MP40 SHOULD BE IN NORMANDY IF YOU ALREADY UNLOCK IN MOSCOW.
Germans would get to build up Xp over 4 campaigns
GIVE ALLIES STRONGER STARTING WEAPONS, GIVE ALL AMERICANS M1 GARAND AS A STARTING WEAPON. YOU CAN EVEN USE DIFFERENT M1 GARAND VARIANTS, I.E MAKE AMERICANS START WITH GAS TRAP GARAND, GIVE THEM THE UPDATED ONE AFTER RANKING UP.
ah yes it’s totally fair for the germans to start with KTs that earned in normandy while USSR has to fight those with the t-34-85 that is their starting tank, might as well give them assault rifles while russia has to grind with svts and mosins since after all STG44 was in service since 1943 so it would be fair game for normandy
No - those are bad ideas - giving the allies stronger weapons to account for Axis ability to gathe xp over several campaigns is grossly unfair on starting players for the axis for example.
Your ideas are full of really bad unintended consequences.
The current system treats each campaign as a game in its own right, just using a common engine with the other campaigns - this is by far the best way to run them.
no - machineguns should be - that is why machineguns were invented - because htey have more firepower than rifles.
also bolt action rifles use the same cartridge as self-loading rifles - yet in this game SLR’s deal less damage due “balance” … but SLR’s should be better than bolt actions - for the same reason as MG’s - because htey HAVE more firepower!
It is not a “solution” because this is not actually a problem.
lmfao nice ad hominin you got there, and no i’m not a furry. the KT was in normandy, same with the panthers and tiger, also most accounts say that there was around 100 tigers in normandy. and SMGs are for close range while STG44 is both medium and short range due it being official classed as an smg, mp43 was it’s first name, also there is an easy solution to not get Dem packed in urban warfare, and that is don’t keep still also i know you’re typing so i recommend you turning off caps lock
firerate don’t mean shit in this game, you start with about 3-4 mags so faster firing guns you’ll burn up your ammo making that gun useless, it’s the sole reason why i prefer grease gun and mp38 over the ppds
Your ideas about “lugging LNG’s between buildings” and that SLR’s are not better than bolt action rifles show you have no grasp of reality - you are spamming, and I’m going to flag this and simlar posts as spam and ad hom attacks - both of which are breaches of forum rules.
If you want to engage in a reasonable manner then by all means do so.
no i prefer those guns because i have more control of my ammo count allowing me to use them outside of their effective range, compared to the ppds which is the literal embodiment of spray and pray, also you are the one being toxic here as an fyi
