Well, how should I put it? Ever since the H version was released on the 4th, this thing’s pretty much just there for show. It’s not that strong in terms of performance, but if you want its front hull armor to 100% resist Soviet 76mm shells, you can get it. Even though the side appliqué armor widens the hull, it still gets penetrated by satchel charges.
Compared to the J model, though, this tank uses electric transmission, so it doesn’t have that slow, sluggish turret rotation issue. I think it could be a decent BR 3 German tank for grinding silver lions.
1 Like
Pretty sure they got rid of the manual rotation speed on the regular J a while ago.
That’s the thing, I main machineguns on German BR3, it’s probably not as good as USSR BR3 smg spam in term of shear strength but it certainly shine in its own way.
In the historical battles depicted in “enlisted,” the Panzer IV Ausf. J could at least withstand long-range artillery fire thanks to its frontal armor. Now, it has virtually no armor and can be destroyed with a single shot. Furthermore, your unreasonable attitude is extremely offensive. Even if the Panzer IV were downgraded to Tier III, the British Achilles’ heel destroyer you’re demanding be downgraded to, like the American Hellcat, could penetrate its armor in restricted areas.
You have no clue what you’re even talking about anymore 
it’s hilarious watching you crumble