How would you guys feel about a change in the campaign system?

Suggestions
1
2 Likes
2
3

Until someone comes up with a decent system, I don’t mind the existing one.

4

I was thinking something along the lines of Western front Eastern front and African front…

1 Like
5

Trouble is, Western front doesn’t really change equipment throughout the war, mostly uniforms over the winter, but certainly no new guns, so why people want the Bulge to appear is beyond me.

Eastern front lasts for 4 years, so the equipment, certainly for the Soviets changes vastly, while the germans don’t really get much. So it wouldn’t really be fair to group this one up, also it wouldn’t be fun to see Germans in a moscow map with MP3008s or VK2s

Africa isn’t likely to get anything more, Early campaign was more about armour and war of mobility than infantry fighting. Tunisia was a much more sustained fight so i see no need to change this one

8

The thing with what I suggested is that they could add the Bulge as a mini campaign to Normandy BECAUSE they have similar equipment. The whole point of this is so that we can experience different battles without having to regrind the same stuff. It adds more map variety. 2-3 maps is all those mini campaigns would need.

9

I like the idea probably i stick in Poland

1 Like
10

I see what you talk about where there’s a campaign tree. It could do the players get to choose what they want to unlock and adds for variety. My idea I guess focuses more on map variety, without having to deal with repetitive grind of the same gear. No one wants to unlock Moscow gear for Stalingrad again just cause it’s Stalingrad. If you read my post than the solution I suggest negates that.

1 Like