It gets ‘special’ rules
Us has a
Sprinfield, bar, sherman, thompson, garand problem alone,
It is true ,however there is no option to only play italy on italian fronts, if italy gets separated tehen they could get event/premium german squads, not regual german squad in their tt.
The commonwhealt has their own experimental weapons, at first they might not have a weapon type in every br, but after some updates it could be filled up with experimental weapons like other tt’s.
I am fine with a true us - Commonwealth tech tree
I am not ok with the uk commonwealth taking its toys creating gaps in the us tree and borrowing or stealing us weapons to close its own
As bad as the us tech tree would be the uk would be worse
But the us does need a few gaps closed as does the uk
Given the snails habits it could take a year or two to close the gaps
I agree the gaps are only problem because they refuse to close them, this the main problem if a separation happens.They instead would add bp and event weapons.
Because event and BP increase gameplay, and tech tree creat…,good will, a metric impossible to sell to investors
They are also gaps only if Italy and uk are separated
Which is fine unless you want separate countries letting the uk and italy fight without us and Germany, which is bad
By that i mean games where players can only play as uk or us agaist only germany or Italy
Not that a player with uk line up could fight alongside a player with an all us or mixed lineup very bad indeed
I don’t think adding even more factions to the game is a good idea
We have forwarded that players do want an italian/british subtree