In the current version, soldiers are seriously lacking the power to counter vehicles, so they must have anti-tank grenades that can be used in anti-tank rifles, recoilless guns, rocket launchers, anti-tank grenade launchers, and other late-stage weapons. Early-stage items appear, and for armored soldiers, they can also have anti-aircraft and anti-vehicle vehicles to counter tanks and airplanes, so as to increase the survival rate and balance of some soldiers.
1 Like
yeah i would like the M16 quad 50.s, not a flakvierling for US, i know it is a placeholder, but i kinda want it now
2 Likes
A yes, a better-than-every-way flakvierling.
Featuring: A capsule-like turret that’s nigh immune to small-arms fire, better traverse, guns with deeper magazines than a flak, and an overall smaller profile, so it fits into all those tight nooks and crannies.
Buildable MG nests are already joke compared to regular flakvierlings.
The quad .50 turret will literally be destroyer of worlds, and nothing short of tanks or bombs can get rid of them. As if dealing with flak turrets when in the open aren’t already a problem.
2 Likes
the Flakvierling 38 in reality was able to destroy light tanks having AP ammunition what we have in the enlisted is a bad copy of him unable even to hit the planes
FlaK 38 ammunition.
*explosive foil-grenade
*envelope-bursting-incendiary grenade
*Inert piercing bag-grenade with tungsten core
*bursting-incendiary piercing-shell-grenade
*inert exercise bag-grenade
All bullets were equipped with a self-destruct mechanism and disruptive and bursting-incendiary bullets could be equipped with tracer
1 Like