I would much rather if this be decided to be a need change to do it across all factions at the same time.
Alecto to br1, su76m to br 1, marder 2 to br 1, maybe get the m3 half track from wt and add it to br 1.
Anyways I don’t get why whenever I’m asking to buff the Chaffee the 75mm is this godlike cannon that should be revered and is a rarity in br 2 then with this y’all are asking for a 75mm very similar in performance at br 1.
I don’t see problem
The M24 has three machine guns, is very fast, has good penetration and has a roof, and you’re comparing it to a tank that doesn’t have a roof, is slow, has no turret and no machine guns
M24 is great as it is.
Don’t tell this guy about the italian 75mm Semovente in BR1
he already talked about it. It has no HE, only having APHE.
the 16 rounds of HE projectiles could be replaced with one of the following type, and then it would be mostly fine for BR 1:
type 95 aphe - already exists in game (used by ho-i)
type 90 shrapnel
type 97 he - has considerably less tnt filler (420g vs 810g)
Doesn’t have good penetration. Has average penetration. And it has bad damage. It is the longest reload in the game for a round with bad damage. Saved for debatably the Alecto. The pz4 f1 also just kinda outclasses it all the actually important stats like overall he performance armor machine guns and tank on tank combat.
It has great penetration, just a skill issue, It’s great as it
And the ho ni 1 has a better cannon. Quicker reload better pen and significantly better damage. So what’s the justification of not giving the Chaffee apcbc if its main upside is surpassed by a tank that’s apparently br 1 material
91 mm with an abysmal angle modifier is not great penetration lmfao. Pz4 f1 is supposed to have bad pen but it has a round with only 11 mm less that performs much much better at angles.
Once again
Ho-Ni I has no armor, no turret, no machine gun and is completely open
The M24 has three machine guns, is very fast, has good penetration and has a roof
M24 is much better
And the ho ni has a quicker reload more pen better angle performance and much much better post pen damage. So why can’t the tank a br above at least have good post pen and good pen?
Because he already has many good things
Like bad armor slow reload and poor ammo stowage
All BR2 tanks have poor armor
And why are we discussing about the M24? From what I remember, this post is about Ho-Ni I
The m24 has especially bad armor.
Ho-Ni I has worse armor.
But the Stug III A could be BR2 worthy with a shell change. Vehicles like the Ho-Ni I and Alecto have no armor, no turret, no machine gun, and are open top, the fact that they have guns that are big for BR1 are the only things they have going for them.
It’s relevant cuz if the 75mm is special in br 2 it doesn’t belong in br 1
If the tank has no armor, no turret, no machine gun and is completely open I think it’s BR1 and the semovente is in BR1 with much better armor, it has a roof and the APHE is very good against infantry
Im pretty sure you meant that ironically.
