Since now we have Mustard Gas in game will be a shame to leave this cancer out of the main game so I made few event or premium squads for Japan that can be equipped with Mustard Gas. All this squads will be fun to use and will be good against all forms of life and yes your tin can tanks wont protect your crew from it so despite not able to damage tanks it can kill the crew inside the tank. But that’s purely academical since all this weapons will be used for peaceful purposes
Thanks to this event I managed to experiment with the mustard gas on live subjects and the test is successful we can safely add this Japanese Mustard Gas squads to the game:
1.My Personal Type 94 Gas scattering vehicle will bring the Mustad gas in to world war 2 format
As you can see adding the Mustard Gas to the main game can be absolutely healthy to this community imagine all the fun you can have with Mustard Gas World War 2 Format
Yes
No
0voters
So what do you think shall we have a bit of Mustard Gas Fun
I was planning to finish my villain arc era and limit myself to world domination but this event really opened my eyes to all the wonders and fun of chemical warfare
Well yes many of them where used by Japan including Japanese chemical grenades they can be added also where successfully used against tanks The bombs also are with Mustad Gas sadly the grenades are with Hydrogen Cyanide so the devs must put extra time to add them.
The Japanese chemical warfare units in World War II had an utterly disgraceful record. They conducted brutal biological experiments on large numbers of prisoners of war and civilians, while using the data obtained to develop biochemical weapons for mass population elimination and colonial domination.
The Chinese people suffered immensely from these atrocities. The only notable case of Japan using chemical weapons against enemy forces in WWII was during the Battle of Khalkhin Gol, when they poisoned rivers near Soviet positions. In reality, however, this had little effect and instead backfired, poisoning their own troops.
In short, chemical weapons were widely used in WWI because both sides employed them and no international treaties existed yet. By WWII, they were clearly banned by international conventions. Any force that still used such weapons essentially showed complete disregard for the Geneva Conventions.
In World War I, gas masks were added to the telescope slot specifically to defend against poison gas.
Here’s the problem: the gas in this game acts more like white phosphorus rounds. It seems to be more widely available, with more deployment methods — aircraft, tanks, and artillery can all deploy it.
But as for defense: it would be fine if every soldier had it as basic equipment. However, if you have to buy and equip it manually, it feels really inconvenient, and it might conflict with your original gear.
Besides, it’s unclear whether your AI teammates will automatically put on gas masks when exposed to it.
They use them in Okinawa also and in the fall of Shanghai and many other times. Japan did not ratify the Geneva Conventions , meaning they were not legally bound to its protocols during World War II.
but we can have NKV squads, we all know what they did, we have the moroco squad who did nasty things as well, the german SS,etc. please, drop the hipocresy, thank you, if we are going to worry about that now, just do me a favor, delete japan as faction, probably at least a 90% of their actual squads, including event and premium are involved in nasty stuff during ww2
Japan was my highest win rate nation by far sitting over 80%. It’s now dropped down and been hanging out in the 70s. They are not a bad nation to fight with.
Sory, its not working like that. If something is generally accepted international law and you don’t follow it, you’ll be judged for it at the first opportunity, even if you haven’t signed or ratified the document. This is akin to “ignorantia legis neminem excusat” (ignorance of law excuses no one). Just on international level. And its harder to execute than on state level. But still it is.
It depends is there is some one to enforce it and the League of Nations was useless organization that was unable to enforce nothing since the main enforcer was France that was busy creating some big defensive line so imagine how helpful this line was to China when the Japanese used poison gas on them or to Poland when they got invaded from two sides all they did is to expel USSR from league of nations that was already useless since Japan, Germany and Italy left and US was in its Isolationist era so it was up to UK and France to enforce the international law and one of the enforcers wasted huge amount of resources building a defensive wall…
By who by the people that where expelled from it literally the people that judged them where the Soviets and USA. USA did not even wanted to commit to it and USSR got expelled from it. Henry Cabot Lodge was absolutely against it and even after they accepted to be part of it there was no commitment since it was run by bunch of European nations that where useless enforcers after WW 1 when they destroyed their nations. WW 1 was really the final nail of European dominance and the death of Europe as a global player so there was not really international law since no European nation was able to enforce it.
Lack of enforcement does not mean legality of actions.
It depends. It wasn’t effective in stopping countries seeking total war of a pseudo-religious nature. However, it was successful in resolving numerous border conflicts after the end of World War I. This is something that’s often forgotten, as a few kilometers of countryside with few cottages isn’t particularly interesting for casual historians.
I sense sarcasm. It was a good concept. Rational from the perspective of WW1. The fortifications were meant to fulfill a specific purpose, not be indestructible. The best proof of its rationality was that the supposed inventors of the blitzkrieg (which wasn’t actually called that and wasn’t unique) had built a dozen or so similar lines over the course of eight years, and no one disputes it. Its not like they were supposed to hold whole invasion.
Its not like normal state judges catch themselfs criminals too. But there is always end of war. And international law is enforced to a certain extent after it. Nuremberg and Tokyo took place. And in individual countries, thousands of local courts were held based on international law.
You don’t have to lecture me about the hypocrisy of the victorious powers. My country was sold by one and occupied by the other. its not the point.
The point is:
Its legality problem. You formed it that way. And from legal perspective you are bound anyway. And as I said:
People were hanged for violating international law. Not all of them. A minority. And they were hanged by the chip-critics. But they were hanged despite not having signed the conventions under which they were tried.
