Give a meta weapon to soviet saboteur

I just afraid not many people use it as I see so soviet saboteur will be exposed quite fast

Hmm, well that is a logical statement actually.

However to be fair this is only the case because it sucked ass before the buff which is still quite new.

I have also only started using it just a couple of weeks ago.

My personal guess is that more people will actually use it once people try it out, but you are right, the majority probably is still using Beretta.

Also I think you are missing one crucial detail - how I understood it, those Saboteurs are gonna have regular spawns and need to change Uniforms with a dead enemy before even looking like them - which means you can also then logically pick up their weapon aswell.

Also look at that picture of that US Saboteur - is he gonna use a Japanese SMG also while fighting vs Germans? Thats a much bigger problem if that would be the case.

1 Like

Bro you said ts yourself…

I’m partial to the MP-40.

I think i’ll like the saboteur because you know SneakyFish.

MP40 is obviously the most iconic SMG and would blend in very well - but in my opinion is terrible and not even worth being used in BR2.

Also its not a BR3 gun - so unless they add one of those Steyer late production rapid fire MP40, it would pretty much make the Soviet saboteur the weakest of the four.

I like it because its trusty and reliable at least in game like the M3 greasey boi

That would be just great. Although I wouldn’t say no to the regular one either. I quite like it.

If I’m not mistaken, the Japanese saboteur is armed with a BR2 Thompson.

maybe M1A1 will be moved back to BR3 finally (fingers crossed).

3 Likes

Setting aside the supposed advantage of soviet body armour, which I still don’t think is that big, I do not support this idea as;

  1. Most of the time you just see a figure in the distance. If you’re close enough that people are examining your gun you’ve probably got too close. From what we know this class is meant to pick off people discretely.
  2. There’s nothing wrong with the MP35.
  3. This idea creates unnecessary noise when there are bigger problems with the class concept.

bad players wont recognize saboteurs even if soviets had grease gun or garand.
good players will just shoot any solo soldier that is not attacking cap.

i consider myself great player(for enlisted standards) and i am not checking enemy guns… if i am not checking, i dont believe that 99% of playerbase will be checking the guns.

1 Like

Enlisted forum commoner try not to mention body armor challenge: impossible.

1 Like

God forbid a pressing issue that was said to be spur of the moment by the community is mentioned again.

2 Likes

Since you have been so apt to use the off topic reasoning when reporting you would know such is against the rules.

I said that body armor compensates for this weakness so the suggestion shouldn’t be implemented. Pls justify how that’s not on topic.

How is that even relevant… body armor is not related to changing the weapon of a squad class and is you saying “they have X which is good so they don’t need A adjusted”

In fact that’s literally what you said.

Area of balance? No… soviets getting a weapon that fits in japan more is not related to body armor and also soviets don’t face body armor? so the damage the weapon gets is irrelevant.

I’m not even going to argue with this… the fact you are so dead set on this is hilarious given this is held with reservations in mind… now keep in mind i’m no stranger to that but look at yourself… lol.

I really hope you’re not serious… i was quick to back down when personal feelings were the only thing preventing me from agreeing with your suggestion… here you are trying to double down on it… it’s pathetic dude… it’s one more bullet to kill… find something else to do.

Russia has it and asymmetrical balancing. Duh.

Sorry is that a dumb argument? I borrowed it from you whenever you were desperately defending body armor