because some here has an IQ of an rusted fridge
They’ve already said that BR won’t be a hard lock out. It will TRY to match you with an equivalent battle rating. I’d expect at least a variation range of 3 stars.
I’d prefer a combination approach for ALL players, not a select few:
- MAP SELECTION OPTION: Each campaign will list every map available for that particular campaign. The more popular maps will have multiple versions available to play on. There will be a 3 to 5 minute join period to start a game with a minimum of 4 players for each team. Maps that are already engaged in battle will list how many players are on each team and allow new players to join whichever faction they choose—with a limit of two extra players per faction, i.e. one team is allowed two more players than the other team if people don’t want to join the opposing faction.
This proposal will not only allow people to play whatever campaign they want to, it will also allow them to choose specific maps to play on! This option is for people who don’t want an algorithm telling them where to play. Full control is given to the player.
- PROPOSED MATCHMAKING CHANGES BY THE DEVS: In addition to the above, implement the new system as well. This will allow players to quickly get into games with other players who have similar loadouts & experience.
Lock these maps down so other players CANNOT join these maps unless they joined with the “quick matchmaking” option proposed by the developers. These players are then guaranteed to battle with opponents with similar loadouts and experience in the game. No more playing against just bots, which is a problem for some people.
Just my opinion; I don’t like options taken away… I want to see more options. . If the player base is divided to an extent that can’t handle the above options, then there’s another problem that’s not being addressed: Most likely player attraction or player retention (or both).
well you can use custom games. Since there seems to be “alot” of people more intrested of historical accuracy rather than balance of the game.
Im sure the custom games are full of lobbies with historical settings.
I think it will start as 1 star, then go to 2, then go to 3, so on and so on
1 Like
Well personally I would like an official historical mode, not custom lobbies made by random dudes
1 Like
And who knows, one might come if this HA “community” is big enough for devs to go thru effort for it.
I seriously hope so for bot our sake and the game’s (and consequently their wallets)
Then create that custom server yourself.
Well it was just a proposal.
Yes but they’ve already said that it’s not a hard BR lock, and it will pick up lower BR players if it can’t fill the match with equal BR. I’m saying it will be a range of what ends up in a match. Like out of 6 stars I think you will tend to see 1-3, 2-4, 3-5, and 4-6
2 Likes
Could be, yes.
You’ll still get variety but have balanced matches at the same time.
It’s a lot easier to face a PZ.IV 1 in my Stuart than a Tiger 2.
Some bolts (with nades) will have higher BR rating so you will be able to play vs semi autos and mid tier smgs. If you are masochist and want to play as bolt vs stgs/fedorovs then pick single high BR rating weapon and then you are in high BR match.