Actually forgot to ping the mods:
@JagdEnte @magazine2 @TheElite96
And again for the record:
I do not care who made this thread. It has obviously already gone off-the-rails with toxicity and will most likely not get any further than this. Leaving it open will only leave chance for further toxicity to be spread.
Its not toxicity. Its us STRONGLY disliking his track records of predatory monetization suggestions.
He stole this from the discord btw
We were joking about horrible things to add and lo and behold this appeared moments after it was posted in the discord. He even edited in the food consumable shit after someone made a gordon ramsay premium food joke.
I am not saying I don’t strongly dislike him and/or his posts. But as he technically does not violate any rules, disagreeing with him “too strongly” with “harsh” words will only end up with you getting banned instead of him. There is no point in arguing against him. A better result is for these kind of threads to be deleted for creating toxicity. It is not a measure against the guy, but a measure against toxic posts.
Posts made to generate toxicity, like those “eNlIsTeD bAd” threads, are locked too. So why would a thread that just spawns toxic responses like this one not get locked as well?
I do have one thing to say to @67929529:
If what @_31420124242011 is saying is true and you did indeed take this from the discord server, please first gauge whether the post can possibly be a post intentionally made to be as bad as possible as a joke.
If it is an actual serious suggestion, please give credit where it is due as well when copying it over, and delete the post if they ask you to as it was their idea. I am sure they would have posted it themselves if they wanted to.
watch im going to reply to this without being a total shithead.
This suggestion is pretty unique but IMO needs a lot of tuning. I would start by removing the maintenance fee for vehicles. Then for standard fuel it should just be what we have now and should still be free. as for the high octane fuel i think the the speed boost should be compensated by getting less ammo, fuel, and a worst turn time. Then it shouldn’t a gold exclusive but it should cost non premium currency. As for the conditioned fuel it should increase your flight time, but have the same drawbacks as the octane fuel with that being less ammo and a worst turn time. I do like some parts of your mess hall idea that being watching your bots chill out before going into combat. But the main suggestion needs some tweaking.
Overall 5.6/10. needs a lot of tuning
If the suggestion would require an entire new in game currency to be added, that would probably not be a good idea as it would cost significant amounts of work to set up and balance out.
Also adding consumables that affect gameplay is a horrible and unfun idea. It will turn more people away than anything.
Thank you for the feedback. It’s nerve wracking sometimes to put your ideas out there due to the potential for negative feedback but I care about the game and hope with our combined efforts we can ensure we have a lot of fun over the coming years. 
I agree with your comments on the fuel and like the idea of there being varying costs/benefits.
I’m glad you like the idea of making the main menu more interactive WRT your troops that you manage. I may make that a separate thread as this one has received a lot of negative attention and I think a fresh OP for a separate idea (instead of having them be linked) would be appropriate.
You weren’t putting your ideas out there, you took a shitpost from the discord to post here for bait.
It would probably be appropriate for you to confirm or deny whether you are part of the discord and whether you saw this idea there before posting.
Again, it is essential that credit is given where due.
Guys i have a suggestion. Keep this game f2p but remove unlocking system. Just make every squad, gun, equipment and vehicle premium. Pls I earn 100k$ a month and don’t know what to do with this, I think it’s great idea how to spend it.
Although I’m not sure if you meant this in the way I am perceiving it, but we do not ban people simply because people strongly disagree. There is a large difference between strongly disagreeing and insulting, flaming, or other rule-breaking behavior, purely on the basis of disagreement. That is where we, moderators, have to step in.
Unrelated to the quote above:
In any case, in this current state I don’t see a reason to close the thread. Those who disagree are showing their clear disagreement and that is perfectly ok. A few comments have been hidden due to their inflammatory nature, but nothing nearly enough to close the entire thread. Nevertheless we’ll keep an eye on everything as per usual.
I / we appreciate that those who do disagree, even strongly, are staying relatively civil. It’s a change in pace since last time and that’s good to see, hope it continues.
Last edit I promise 
Thanks o7
With “harsh” I was referring to what would break forum rules.
I honestly don’t know whether to take this seriously or not. With the recent craze of whales, this view is starting to seem plausible for someone to have, no matter how crazy it may sound.
This is the worst idea I’ve ever heard