Here’s a revolutionary idea.
Stop making obvious spam and troll posts designed to get a rise out of people.
5 Likes
I was hoping we could have a constructive discussion on a fuel mechanic for soldiers/tankers. Already asked Tchof what he’d think would be a better idea for farming the fuel.
How about NOT adding any kind of fuel system to tanks, and just leaving them alone?
Also I love how you take the shitpost suggestions from discord and then put them up here, with monetization of course, so the devs can read them and hoping to make the game worse.
1 Like
idk what a poop post is but I’m assuming it’s some kind of satire.
I think ideas deserve the chance to be discussed and just because I don’t understand it or necessarily initially agree with it I’m not going to dismiss someone’s vision as a “joke” or a “troll”
i’m just here watching all this with some popcorn 
3 Likes
No.
Simple reason is that if we add vehicle maintenance cost (because that’s what your idea is basically) then we will have to add weapon maintenance. Guess what game use that mechanic? Guess what’s the one of the most hated mechanic in said game.
Also, why would soldier pay for his equipment? Or even sergeant or anybody? State gives him equipment, end of story.
2 Likes
Everything we currently have but:
-no extra squads
-no buying progression
-no buying perks
-none of your suggestions
3 Likes
The only reason I thought of vehicle maintenance was to help discourage the spam of vehicles which I keep seeing discussed as a balancing issue.
No one complain about vehicles as all, people complain about the Bf-110 because it’s OP vehicle not vehicles as all
3 Likes
And people already have provided suggestions that will work much better than another layer of monetisation and frustration
3 Likes
By what?
Buying better fuel for real money?
3 Likes
Negative, nien, Nyet, nope, nada, this will just kill the game, not a effective solution for balancing issues.
5 Likes
if that is the case then it was poorly misguided, since i would recommend airfields that forces a plane to rearm there. if a pilot crashes while landing to a point of unable to be repaired then it’s considered a death, this way it will lower aircraft dominance
2 Likes
It would only cause imballance between f2p and paying players.
1st group would have to cut the costs to afford anything while 2nd group would just pump more money into premium fuel.
So not only f2p players would use vehicles less often, but also paying players would have better vehicles.
3 Likes
I see your point Voyo. 
thanks for explaining it.
Now please suggest stuff that doesn’t have anything to do with spending money?
You saw people don’t like those suggestions
Please 
2 Likes
Stop stealing jokes from the discord to post here as legitimate suggestions. This is spam.
3 Likes
I’m always working on new suggestion for our favorite game! Thank you for the words of encouragement 
No, that’s why someone made a thread complaining about it.
3 Likes
Wanted to flag this post for obviously asking for negativity, but it was already flagged. Waiting for lock by moderator.
Premium consumables are highly controversial and should be avoided. That is all.
1 Like