Since flametroopers can’t carry anything in the backpack slot, they should naturally be able to carry 3 molotovs, is it realistic or historical accurate? No, do i care ? No.
3 Likes
Why should they carry useless molotovs, when they have a flamethrower
4 Likes
Cuz they’re FLAMEtroopers
2 Likes
Can we expand this idea to assaulters and give them free assault rifle?
6 Likes
No, assaulters should have 3 grenades by default as they are meant to rush in.
Gunners should have 3 MGs because they are meant to suppress.
8 Likes
Listen. The flametroopers should be able to carry any of the flamethrowers, without limitations to their ammo by it. The different tank in their backpack slot should define the amount of ammunition of the flamethrowers. Currently there is Roks2 (300 ammo) and Roks3 (200) ammo. Why cant we choose their amount of ammo by their tanks?
We can’t chose ammount of fuel but we can chose flamethrower that consumes less (tier I) or more (tier II) fuel.
I accept every suggestion IF, ONLY IF the radioman comes with a free spotify premium account.
Otherwise its complete BS to me.
Flat earther? 
2 Likes
I know, but i mean the amount of fuel should be decided by the tank and not the flamethrower itself
2 Likes
No, its decided by both, just like with a car, you can have a 16 gallon tank and a 1 mile per gallon and get the same miles on a full tank as a 4 gallon tank and a 4 mile per gallon engine. In our case, we have one tank for two different types of flamethrowers, one of which burns through fuel faster and thus “has less ammo”.
And if there is a Bluetooth speaker nearby
Imagine charging into battle with ERIKA blasting through the battlefield
2 Likes
Had that happen on HLL last night.
Proceeded to steamroll the objective, as nearly our entire horde sang along.
1 Like
Bombers should also have an anti-aircraft gun. I could really use a Bofors 40mm in tandem with an M1 Bazooka.
Bombers II should then have a 8.8 canon in their pocket. 