Still more than, chaffee, t20, hyde, tommy with drum and so on.
I’m sorry, but as much as you might not like it, they are WW2.They were built and used in combat
But they were used, and squadrons were formed with those weapons, whether you like it or not.
Even if the squads were based on their real-life counterparts, I assure you that many players would choose the Fallschirmjäger Squads. To be able to use the FG42So nothing changes
1 Like
of course because they would still be using them in unrealistic numbers
if germany got to use say 5 fg42s 20 g41/43s 75 kar 98s vs 40 garands, 45 carbine and 15 for the rest no. it have to be based on numbers made
so fg42 10 points garand 2.5 points g41 5 points kar98 springfield 1 point. its not just based on the loadout of individual squad but how many of those squads were in the entire army.
Not precisely because there are several divisions and platoons of Fallschirmjäger where the FG42 was used as both a primary and secondary weapon Where will there be squadrons with purely the FG42 or accompanied From the Kar98k,Gewehr 41/43,MP40,MKB 42(H), STG44/MP44 and MG34/42 So there will be no change whatsoever in the amount of FG42 that will be in matches.
As I mentioned above, nothing changes.
again thats not ww2
if they had a fully armored fg42 squad they would have to rotate it in every 20th squad
they would get one full fg42 squad 3 g41/g43 16 kar 98
us 6 garand squads 6 carbine 8 every other rifle
yes no t20 and only say a johnson squad worth
again i am saying they need to be as rare or close in ww2
I just gave you the realistic answer you’ve been asking for, where I limit the FG42 to Fallschirmjäger squadrons Where the FG42 will be the primary or secondary weapon, where squadrons with their different KStN from the 43rd to the 45th have changes in the incorporation of the FG42 And the amount will be the same It simply doesn’t change or disappear.
and hundreds of divisions that did not have them or even g41 g43 rifles but kar98
They used those weapons plus the ones mentioned above.
yes but most of them use the kar98 15 million made adding all the others rifles amounts to under a million
Even so, several squads of 9 soldiers can be armed with various FG42s as their primary or secondary weapon, plus the weapons I mentioned. It doesn’t change anything.
and from allies most used mosin nagant so not exactly sure what you are going here.
Removal of garands ?
again thats not ww2 fg42 need to be the minority of the weapons you take into battle
If it’s WWII, because it’s possible and this configuration was used, and now I’m just limiting myself to putting the FG42 only on the Fallschirmjäger And to see that even this doesn’t benefit you or your allies, you deny reality. It’s real, like the Kugelblitz.
shall we remove entire murrica from european maps as they were minority compared to ussr ?
one the fg42 was a minority weapon in the minority of the battle it was used in
the americans were present in numbers in the battle they participated in no one is asking to add americans to the western front
yes there were not only 100k to 180 k german p-troopers
its lucky only a few hundred k germans served in the army not nearly 20 million in all services most in the army
ok the germans should have better planes lets just add the super fortress i mean large numbers of them made large number served in the war lets bring the thunder
Enemies were used and killed, unlike your Prototypes, so it’s not the same. How the Kugelblitz
no there not the same they are just as bad
im sorry but the germans were not dominating the battlefield with fg42s they were bumbling around with kar98s
so while most us soldiers had garands well do the math
But they held them at bay and inflicted heavy casualties, the Fallschirmjäger with the FG42 supported by other weapons alongside the Wehrmacht and Waffen SS The same goes for the Kugelblitz.