The type 92 has become a joke at least for me to excuse incredibly heavy weapons. Both the s18 and type 92 far outclass any br1 at rifle. We have 5 round semi auto and bolt action at rifles in the same br. Given pen putting them all br makes sense. Simple allowing the s18 to be un-nerfed does not. The s18 was moved from br2 to br1 and the 92 only started at br 2 because japan lacks any other br1 at weapon in the tech tree.
All rifles required to be prone for semi automfire
All rifles require prone to fire at all
No
0voters
My solution is add the movement penalty to the 92 and s18 regardless of what weapon is equipped. Only to the 92 and s18 balancing the current at rifles at br1. In exchange for this the s18!will operate like any other at rifle. That is no longer required to be prone to fire.
If that is not enough all at rifles will be required to be prone to fire in semi auto mode. But the s18 and type 92 will still experience the movement penalty even if the at soldier has the regular rifle equipped. please tell we what you think I am tired of trying to buff the s18 the best at rifle in game.
If they are going to implement it on solothurn then they need to do it to all the other ones… especially the jap one and ptrs… so they complain and then they finally realize how stupid of mechanic this was to include in the game.
It introduces the ability to add a lot of normally extremely heavy weapons… but at the cost of defying the base of the game… you can prop up and shoot but get attracted by X amount of bots… it’s not an enjoyable experience.
the type 92 or the jap one as you call it yes
every at rifle no
The s18 has the best pen a 10 round magazine and is semi auto
the s18 needs a nerf to on the same br as every at rifle but the type 92
did you even read it is like comparing a br2 semi auto and a br3
the s18 started life at br2
it ‘needs’ a nerf that only it and the type 92 gets
if you want it unerfed it needs to drop to 5 round magazine
a br1 s18 10 rounds without prone requirement hell no
unless you find a meaningful way to buff every at rifle but the type 92 and s218
the point of adding the movement penalty is to remove the prone requirement.
I am not just trying to stack nerfs onto the s18 or add them to the type 92.
no br1 as is s18 as it is only buffing it to remove the prone requirements is not balanced any more than a garand at br2 by itself
s18 10 round semi auto
type 92 8 round semi auto
we also have 5 round semi autos
5 bound bolt action
and a 1 round rifle
imagine if we treated rifles the same way br1 to br4 would all be the same br
and its funny how many people want an already top tier broken weapon wanty that weapon to be even more broken. it has a magazine twice as large as any competitor, the type 97 Japanese will never fight the s18-100, it has among the best penetration.
i admit forcing it to go prone to use is harsh, but the s18-100 without any handicap against five round semio autos, bolt actions is just a joke
