6 Likes
I understand that “this is not a tank but a car so put it in the rider slot” but since this car is also not a motorbike, I vote no.
Because otherwise you might be facing an enemy team with 2 tanks + this thing, a bit too much maybe.
BTW what about other armoured cars like he AB41 and the Daimler, should they then also not be in a bike slot?
3 Likes
The car is useless in the framework of the game
There is no damage, the penetration for 1br is excessive
There are no high-explosive shells that actually existed, but were not added to the game, because the stupid cntrc-cntrv
If the developer continues to do this for big events (and not small comic ones like the liberation of Rome), then it’s a shame.
The game is going into such a huge hole
2 Likes
I really don’t care whether it’s classified as a tank or a rider vehicle. It doesn’t change the fact that it’s a weak vehicle that doesn’t work well in this game.
And it’s going to be played only by a very small amount of individuals who are spending way too much time in this game, so they’re willing to play even the most pointless content (I’m one of them, by the way).
But we should at least have gotten it with its own event squad.
Things like this never cease to amaze me. It’s as if, with every new update, they’re paying less and less attention to the details that you notice after just half a minute of playing.
They’re just totally careless about the game at this point. They really can’t be more bothered.
4 Likes
4 Likes
Hm hm, I wonder what would happen when we give these armored scout cars the ability to capture objectives… or we let them call in artillery strikes.
3 Likes
sure thing honey.
i suppose humor isn’t for everyone.
while they are not the same thing 1 on 1,
they could coexist in what they do.
imo this could be the starter and an improvement that rider needed in order to be more appeasing to more people.
Which i’d recon it’s rather balanced.
because, while it has armor you’re trading it for a 3rd specialist member since it’s a 2 seater.
it’s kinda asymmetrical balanced.
and from what i saw day 1, the gunner is a goner.
so imo, moving outside the tankers squads is only a plus.
that’s a cool thing though.
aka, the ability to chose to have your rider to have a machinegun and increase the anti infantry capability,
or an anti tank rifle. to lose the ability against anti infantry, but gain the ability to midly be more effective against others riders vehicles, APCs, Bikes and Emplacements.
somewhat of a fair point.
but, i much like APCs theese type of armored vehicles ( not jeeps or bikes ) have their own Limit per team.
i doubt a car ( be it a 222, 221, m3 scout car, m8 grehound etc ) that can be easily destroyed with anti tank rifles or rocket launcher is much of a threat.
Honestly, yes.
increase their br, and move them outside the tankers slots.
they have no business there.
1 Like
it can have it’s uses.
just not as a tanker vehicle.
flank to place a rally,
destroy emplacements or enemy light vehicles ( as of yet, only APCs, and other bikes )
1 Like
I mean, he’s useless.
it does though.
because you can increase it’s uses compared to where it is now.
transform this into a slighlty better rider vehicle.
and be a side grade.
you trade one specialist for either the ability to have an engineer, a radioman or a more powerful AT gunner with br III + explosives
more so a glass cannon.
that’s still better than 0 ( or next to 0 ) like currently.
because everything else is straight up better.
so, instead, we could, and should improve it and not let it be another vehicle to take dust in garages.
which through riders, can be slighty be more effective.
still requires tactic to use it.
since it wont be anouther W + LMB either.
as a tanker?
i’d still say no.
but as a dedicated rider with a event engineer would have be the best rider vehicle to this day.
… kinda true.
1 Like
well, riders cannot capture zones.
so it won’t be much different.
riders do have radiomen though.
2 Likes
no, what is useless is the soviet rocket tank.
that thing don’t kill anything.
this one could be salvaged to do more 
again,
- place rally
- be the first rider vehicle of it’s kind that isn’t a bike ( so more appealing to more people )
- have AT capabilities against light infantry vehicles without taking spots of actual tanks
again, like the soviet bike.
arguably situational, but when you use it to it’s full potential, those can shine.
i kid you not, bikers are a " legit " class that most of the time allowed to clutch
1 Like
Alas, the developer allows himself to introduce garbage equipment, nothing can be done
БM-8-24 transfer to 1 br will save her
not everything has to be meta.
… but not utterly useless either.
both the AB 41, Rocket Artillieries ( US rocket tank is " fine " ) and most armored cars ARE highly uneffective for their ranks.
Giving them to riders would mitigate that.
2 Likes
And I’m not saying that transferring the БM will make it meta.
Just like it didn’t happen with pzfrw42 on 3 br
i hear ya.
which it’s why a push for riders may change that.
i think that halftrack is the prime example of a rider vehicle.
be in the rear, support with rally points, ammo boxes or even radiomen for artillery.
WITHOUT taking a tank spot due to the passive nature of the vehicle it self.
yet, can be easily destroyed by pretty much everything.
Maybe.
It’s the will of the developer
2 Likes
now is ever more so relevant:
put it in here i guess.