not my tipical posts. but i kinda have to leave in a hurry so…
Yes
No
0voters
Make it a rider vehicle
while it’s a neat vehicle, being marked as a tank ( when it’s just a literal car ) is highly ineffective.
Sure, it’s br I.
but i’d argue could be much more worthed if i’d be like the soviet anti tank bike.
And especially, the ability to use specialists from the riders class.
Change the engine sound
the 221 has a rear-mounted 3.5-liter Horch V8 petrol engine .
Yet sounds like every other tank in the game that is german.
Closes there is with such an engine, would be the Opel Olympia that is a map vehicle.
did i say make this vehicle a rider already?
The vehicle is missing a license plate.
One similar to the sdkfz 6 would do even if " damaged ":
The driver cannot be killed with fire arms if you are on the roof.
Unlike the M8 Scott, The Gun Hitboxes are bigger than they should be.
Preventing the enemy from being able to kill the driver when they are on top.
Not only a low effort post but a duplicate one at that… for some reason you think the rules don’t apply to you.
Not one but two… this post also has multiple intentions… and you mentioned make it a rider vehicle three times to clutter your points… i’m assuming in an effort to make it look more prominent?
However despite my disagreement with this initially, i think this is the only way to make it usable… but BR1 tanks aren’t all that great anyway… and from what i’ve seen this 20mm seems to have decent penetration… combined with it being a scout car… it’s not the same as ptrs bike.
I understand that “this is not a tank but a car so put it in the rider slot” but since this car is also not a motorbike, I vote no.
Because otherwise you might be facing an enemy team with 2 tanks + this thing, a bit too much maybe.
BTW what about other armoured cars like he AB41 and the Daimler, should they then also not be in a bike slot?
The car is useless in the framework of the game
There is no damage, the penetration for 1br is excessive
There are no high-explosive shells that actually existed, but were not added to the game, because the stupid cntrc-cntrv
If the developer continues to do this for big events (and not small comic ones like the liberation of Rome), then it’s a shame.
The game is going into such a huge hole
I really don’t care whether it’s classified as a tank or a rider vehicle. It doesn’t change the fact that it’s a weak vehicle that doesn’t work well in this game.
And it’s going to be played only by a very small amount of individuals who are spending way too much time in this game, so they’re willing to play even the most pointless content (I’m one of them, by the way).
But we should at least have gotten it with its own event squad.
Things like this never cease to amaze me. It’s as if, with every new update, they’re paying less and less attention to the details that you notice after just half a minute of playing.
They’re just totally careless about the game at this point. They really can’t be more bothered.
aka, the ability to chose to have your rider to have a machinegun and increase the anti infantry capability,
or an anti tank rifle. to lose the ability against anti infantry, but gain the ability to midly be more effective against others riders vehicles, APCs, Bikes and Emplacements.
but, i much like APCs theese type of armored vehicles ( not jeeps or bikes ) have their own Limit per team.
i doubt a car ( be it a 222, 221, m3 scout car, m8 grehound etc ) that can be easily destroyed with anti tank rifles or rocket launcher is much of a threat.
Honestly, yes.
increase their br, and move them outside the tankers slots.
