I was thinking that the combat of this game feels like an arena type than an actual battlefield.
players are encouraged to go full auto
movements are extremely unrealistic (more than cod)
nerf and update begin to be more and more unhistorical and balance concerned
the player is incentivize to loose their soldiers if this means he get more XP
So what is this game? , a realistic and historically accurate game or an extremely arcade run n gun with a basic history background type of game?
game lacks realistic rallie points. just that.
x)
Well you shouldnt either pull out quad 20mm AA gun out of your ass, but hey the gameplay needs to be interesting.
mamma mia
here we go again
always has been. It just looks like itâs not. I swear itâs why 80% of the playerbase canât get more than 20 kills. Theyâre crouch walking around like itâs Hell Let Loose.
Set in something that could have been a historical background if they bothered to do a smidgen more effort in that direction.
Exactly.
Also, extremely fast aiming speed and reloading speed, too.
And survival isnât worth than death.
I have no idea when Dev clear their goal
Make money - very successfully I think
Then where is our dividend�
Imo the game will evolve into typical arcade meat grinder.
Sure, for some people it will be fun. But my expectations were a bit higher than generic f2p fps.
Yeah I was really hopeful too⌠now Iâm just getting a bit of mindless entertainment for my sunk cost.
Are you a shareholder?
No?
Then what are you taking and where can I get some?
We are shareholder because we âinvestedâ.
I meant there is not enough return.
And who told this to you?
Are you hearing things?
Dividends go to shareholders - are you a shareholder?
No - we are stakeholders - not shareholders.
Shareholders own hte company - stake holders have an interest in it in all sorts of ways and include shareholders, customers, employees, suppliers, inland revenueâŚ
As customers our âRewardâ is pretty toys to play with.
You donât know the metaphor?
Should I explain one more time?