Enlisted needs a Balance Science

Archive Suggestions - Archive
1

People are all around asking for balance, balance balance and balance. AND they are right.

since the new enlisted made a great deal in this new update in many aspects, like the new perk system and the fact no one loosed ANYTHING.

personal i also liked the new balancing matches algorithm, i have see a lot better balanced matches, BUT, the nations now are not balanced has well.

DEV,s and community need to think better if they want to balance the game quick and good.

--------------------------------------------------- suggestion ---------------------------------------

first point: Is a lot easier and fair to add more content based in the needs of the troops in the front line, like add BR5 auto rifle for japz and M26 pershing for US. but that is just a example. careful selecting new stuff is better in all aspect to the game, that nerfing or getting out stuff.

second point: No army in WW2 has perfect, it has it strength and weakness. that’s should be exploited no only in the guns it self, but in many cases lower the Tier level of some guns for some nations.

For example, USA should get M1 Garand very soon compared to Germany G41/G43. since America focus in Rifleman, so we don’t need be perfectly equivalent tech trees. USA might get early Semi auto, and Germany latter, since most German troops where using Kar98 do the fact they doctrine focus in LMG (MG34/MG42)

Other example, is the Soviets lack of pistols or are to Expressive ones, so some gear should be expressive but available. is another way to balance is making it expensive. What means the price of some gears should be different for some nations. While Semi auto rifles has be Easy for USA troops have, Thompsons has be very difficult to acquire.

so, princes and BR should be get in count to balance, and make some gear more accessible and some gear more difficult to get and relative rare. BUT most important thing is, Squads of all nations that have ideal gear, should be very balanced has well.

So the German squads, Full FG42 II, STG44 and MG34 Parametral, should be able to toy to toy a USA squad, Full M2 carbine, LMG Brewing and Thompson 50 bullets.

but i believe that DEV,s got some nice Game Designers whit is more important that ever right now. so it,s better Enlisted start developing some kind o formula to balance things up.

cheers.

1 Like
2

You made this post to bother me with your typos and lack of text form.
Good ideas though.

3 Likes
3

“Toy to toy”

4

If that were the case then all of America’s weapons should be much more cheaper than everyone else’s because INDUSTRY

1 Like
5

Actually the Amerikans weapon were the most expensive… because they don’t have the cheap labor from Soviet union nor the German Stamped Sheet production… but Milled by hands… except the M3 Grease, that pipe gun is cheap

1 Like
6

Ah but have you forgotten the simple economics of supply and demand?
The M1 Thompson Over 1.5 million
The M1 Garand approximately 5.4 million
Sherman Tank About 50,000
M1 Carbine over 6.1 million
P-51 Mustang approximately 15,000
P-38 Lightning 10,038
P-47 Thunderbolt 15,600
BAR 351,679 (from 1917-1945)

7

All arms industries were set up for mas production whether in Germany or Japan or the USSR - although not needing to pay for labour probably lowered some costs marginally.

M1 Garand - approx US$85, Tommy gun - $200 for 1921 down to $45 for M1A1 by 1944 (with some intermediate models costing more than the 1921!), M3 Grease gun $15, Sten UKL2/6 (2 pound 6 shillings) - approx $10!

8

Doesn’t make them cheaper, you just produce more with the same expensive gun lmao

9

Yes, expense of materials does factor into prices

However, so does supply and demand. When demand exceeds supply, prices rise. When supply exceeds demand, prices fall

And we are the best in the world when it comes to supply

10

Except that supply and demand doesn’t work when no one actually buy your expensive guns, as far as I know only the Chinese bought some of them, the british after seeing the cost for a Tommy they legit produce their own Sten gun, the US got so much surplus they strap them on every vehicle they can, most of the US production are used for Lend and lease, which most to the USSR are sunk in the ocean…

US doesn’t really sell guns like germans and swiss does in Pre-war…

What US actually do is selling license, which why there is many BAR variants from foreign country

11

And then we used what we produced once Japan dragged us into the war

12

I believe there should be 4 queue and make them 1-2,2-3,3-4, and then 4-5. This should make it that way 3 stays away from 5 and 1 is away from 3. And then put both the ppd’s in the same file at tier 4. And then put Moscow or add a Leningrad campaign in to the 2-3 and 3-4 queue.

I know this has nothing to do with the weapon economy however I believe this should at least make some middle ground that way there isn’t massive leaps in tiers. Leaving it to where you essentially go into a map/ battle you’re especially kitted out for.

13

tens of thousands silver worth of vg2s