Upvote so everyone sees it and the flood of nonsense post about the upcoming merging ends. 80% of all posts here and on reddit are by people who haven’t read/understood what’s going on.
Alternatively we get 100 more posts this week claiming “BR matchmaking makes games more unfair for new players” and similar nonsense.
I’m looking forward to the merge. Rare games where we have full lobbies are really fun and nerve racking.
Played in a game last night where top 4 guys 2 on each side (me included) had over 100+kills each. It was a slaughter fest and fun as hell.
Hopefully this will be the norm.
I’m looking forward to the merge, but there is one thing in particular that has me concerned:
Explosive packs are FAR too low on the BR list.
Majority of the AT weaponry including AT mines are rarely ever used just because of the one size fits all grenade. As even you @ParaDivision have ALL of your troops equipped with it.
Either there need to be some major changes/ nerfs to it, or the BR rating of it needs to be considerably higher.
BRs havent been mentioned yet. Only tier list which is pretty inconsequential and not equal to BR
I’m 90% sure I saw a spreadsheet that showed the BR rating of equipment.
Explosive packs were at 2, while launchers were at 3, and AT mines were all the way at 4.
Considering there are 5 levels of BR, I’m fairly certain that is what I saw. I’ll go back and look for it in the morning.
That sheet was just a Tier list. Basically all that is, is the order in which you must unlock things. In warthunder its gated by, you cant research a “tier 2” Vehicle until you have researched 3 “tier 1” vehicles. Also you must have researched everything in the same line prior or it will not be available to be unlocked.
TLDR: So the biggest complaints and outcry was over nothing. What they announced has nothing to do with BR, Matchmaking or grind. 10 tiers, or 5 tiers never mattered that much.
Battlerating “BR” is the number assigned per equipment that determines its match making. They havent released a draft of this yet.
In warthunder you can have two vehciles that are both 1.7 BR for example, but 1 vehicle might be tier 1, the other vehicle is Tier 2, but they both get same match making because BR (1.7) is the same.
This is the other big misconception, because they werent clear when they announced it the first time round.
Also dont know how this plays in to deciding what campaign maps will be in the map pool. Maps might be based on BR, or Maps might be based on Tier.
Example using enlisted image for comparison (made up BR numbers just to make point…they havent been released)
Have you got any leaks including BR levels? Because I am not aware of anything like that.
Since the progression tiers devs showed us really do not have anything common to BR levels.
Nevertheless, on low BRs HMG will be way more dangerous than EPs, lol. You just hate concept of EPs and this another of your intellectually dishonest attacks on them.
[quote=“ParaDivision, post:1, topic:121202”]
BR matchmaking makes games more unfair for new players” and similar nonsense.
[LegioX] now u know why people dessert when their face unbalanced games its s kill issue or a console v PC kinda thing
laughs in M13 and M8s
Even McDonalds wasn’t that desperate for upvotes.
Tip from German pleb to CC. Maybe also show the comments you keep talking about instead of “referring” to them and coming up with strawmen. Would make the Ez Soviet Moscow Sweatlord gameplay in the background less, win-win. Where are all those weekly posts, ParaPleb?
And talking about fairer games and trashing sweatlords while blowing up Panzer IIs with the T-34 in the background or about Assault which requires skill is kinda
Also… for the love of god, write a script so it doesn’t feel like a speech from George W. Bush.
You only mocked people who say that people with rifles will still kill newbies and used fancy words but at the end, you basically gave them right.
And I like the shoutouts to the forum… and you wonder why barely anyone upvotes your posts here.
Pretty most people who meant maps most likely meant campaigns otherwise show me the comments for the first time. And it’s pretty stupid that choosing a campaign is almost on par with BR rating-based map selection considering that e.g. the Germans face two different enemies and now cant even choose their enemy based on our current knowledge (same applies to Western Allies)… also the devs said that it’s not hard-locked and depends on player numbers (Same goes for BR). Also new to me that the farm map is generic. Sources are overrated I guess. Source: Trust me, bro. And the last one is a bad joke because the devs keep removing/ locking maps/ modes from the pool.
Wow, the tech tre mistake is right. The assumption is still stupid because looking at WT, most vehicles have higher tier and higher br than lower tier vehicles. And if you already refer to tt, you would have seen that it doesn’t really care about the manufacture date. Also, who cares about the historical stuff if this game doesn’t reflect quality? Skipped after a while because boring as well.
Feels like no. 3 but less like an insulting counter but a tip.
It’s not even a stupid misconception for fuck sake but your own stupid opinion.
Overall, boring, not or barely structured, no sources, too long and boring sweat lord gameplay in the background, and partly bad English (Biplane, nicht Doppeldecker).
Waste of time. Never gonna watch another video.
found the leader of the forum butthurt army ¯_(ツ)_/¯
Ähm Are sie ähm schure ähm?
Newer minden ähn. Ich of neez to go to Tunisia Allies and Berlin Deutsch for meer Anti-sweatlord gameepley.
I agree with everything he said, the video is way too long and unprofessional.
merge problem who I see: I play german,but x players hate russians maps,they quit people,that’s all major