Lol, SU100 has no machine gun, you want to add fantasy machine gun to SU100?
There needs to be separate gamemodes that feature historical fantasy weapons + historical fantasy scenarios (Operation Sealion, aka German Invasion of Britain; Operation Downfall, the US invasion of mainland Japan; and Operation Unthinkable, the Allies’ continuation war against the USSR) and historically accurate gamemode that was practically the first year of release of Enlisted where an overwhelming majority but a special few squads were using bolt actions.
DT-29 is a real weapon (it is also available to use for infantry).
To add or not to add - surely it is just not as conspicuous as AS-44 (7 weapons were built up to mid 1946) and most players would not even notice that detail.
they actually said that something like this would be possible through custom games, it would be possible to limit individual weapons and vehicles, thereby creating conditions for such gameplay.
Would be great if customs weren’t crap
SU-100 has no DT machine gun even on the real thing. ISU-152 had DShK on the cupola.
Lol you want historical accuracy but you want to add dt29 that was not used on su100.
Lets add MG131 and Wurfrahmen 40 on German tank then, since those are real weapon.
Devs want to know the answer too
Can you quote my words where I “want more historical accuracy” or they are only your imagination ?
This may have been a good argument a few years ago when the state of the entire industry was in doubt, but there has been a renaissance of passion in gaming (BG3, AC6, Starfield) that I think reflects the reality that players will flock to a game that KNOWS WHAT IT WANTS TO BE.
The problem with Enlisted right now its that it is a “Jack of all Trades, Master of None” and that allows for a toxic mix of different players that all want different things (and they all get SOME of what they want)
say thank you to the Twitch streamer-effect from 3 years ago. cheesing xp ruined it for the rest of us
Enlisted is…enlisted
Its USP is WW2 ai squad mates and easenof access for console players…
The mire it tries to be COD etc. The worse it gets… people who play cod will play that… and those games do a better job across the board. So those who want cod wont play and theyll have driven away those who want ww2 bur dontnor cant play HLL…
Ive bwen playjng a lot less as its lost its way… jt can still be fun but that ends up deing despite the game… not because of it…
This game is a great blend of arcade and hardcore. And there is nothing wrong with the AS-44 because it was a WW2 prototype near the end of the war. This game has such a huge variety of content from the famous and mass produced to rare, prototype, and experimental.
This game may not be Red Orchestra 2 or Hell Let Loose but its not COD or Battlefield either its just that some people treat this as War Thunder with infantry.
Well,
It kinda is.
*BFV and CoD Vanguard want to know your location
Ok. I get your point over all. But your interpretation of historical accuracy is a bit odd…
SU-100 had no machine gun.
Majority of the Wehrmacht used the K98 or K98k, never the Gewehr 43. (Was used by the alpine hunter divisions).
The IS had a high reload time (how the hell you want to reload quicky that kind of ammunition into the breech.)
My point is that game should use historical weapons and vehicles, which LOOKS authentic (M1 Garand holds 8 rounds while Gewehr 43 - 10), but - the details MIGHT be altered / hidden to balance the gameplay.
By “details” I mean - damage, reload time, effective range.
For example - increasing base damage of PPSh-41 from 5.5 to 6.5.
95 % of players never saw that gun in real life and will not notice this. But - they will see that PPSh-41 is unlocked at the end of the campaign (level 26 in Berlin) so for them it looks normal that it should be better than weapon available at the start (PPS-42) - even if it has similiar mechanism and uses the same ammo.
Unrealistic ? But for me it still looks way better than a whole squads equipped with an AS-44 / RD-44.
Same with the vehicles - they should LOOK authentic, but again - some parameters might be altered (speed / reload time / quality of armor / penetration) if it is justified due to the balance.
It is only a game, not encyclopedia.
I don’t see anyone insulting him… I make a similar post and everyone comes to cry and insult me…
Regarding the post, you are right. I think the developers don’t know where they want to take the game.