Lmao. You have no clue.
why only japans need bombers rokcet jet and german rocket jet over for ww2
and heavy bombers b29 other jets planes
How many more years do we have to wait for all of these to be added, and when will the Cold War arrive?
Bad solution, it will also piss of players that enjoys current Normandy and Pacific map.
Only 2? So it is not really comparable to the video you posted. But I will say even 1 battleship has greater fire power against infantry than all of the other stuff you mentioned.
You will be dead already, there is no chance to use med kit unless you are far away from the explosion. Consider the small map and how many large caliber shell it can fire at a time, this will be unlikely.
Do maps really have to be this small?
A single Kikka 800kg torpedo can destroy an entire ship.
That is how current map works. Unless you expect dev to put in a lot of effort to design new map specifically for it.
I don’t think it can carry a torpedo in War Thunder. Also I doubt how many players will bring planes that carries torpedo in the first place. Not to mention the ship can fire several salvo causing great damage before a plane tries to target it.
How is it related to our discussion lol? This is a mini event.
Why are some people in this forum ignoring the game’s shortcomings and looking for fault in those who tell the truth? That’s illogical.
800-1000 or 2000 kg torpedoes can be used against infantry , and hitting a ship with these torpedoes isn’t that difficult. Even an ordinary, unskilled player, even if their plane is destroyed, can launch a torpedo in the direction of the ship, and the torpedo will travel through the water, hit the ship, and inflict heavy damage or destroy it. I personally did this while playing War Thunder.
In the last two years, the Manchuria map and the addition of plane destruction and explosion effects, tank destruction animations, and running animations in the last update were good, but for such a long time span as two years, it’s quite little. Gaijin should have added all the vehicles and ships related to World War II last year, and also added Cold War elements this year. They should have also added building destruction animations and improved jumping animations, but Gaijin is adding ridiculous, pointless, and terrible events.
yes. ships would be viable only on pacific for both teams, otherwise only one team could get access to them(e.g. d-day). also it would serve no purpose besides indirect fire support operating on vast distances( minimum 1-2km) so you wouldnt even have visual confirmation on what you are shooting. also with other vehicles you can disembark and play as infantry and cap, with ship you cant. well you could if you want to get extra 200-3000 infantry in your squad…
In War Thunder, it’s possible to visually track the trajectory of a projectile fired from a ship. Furthermore, World War II ships could fire from distances of 15-42 km, and by carrying warplanes and armed amphibious vehicles, it was possible to be effective on land.
Except small map is a type of design instead of short coming. This game is fast pace and full of action, why should dev change the game design for you?
Unless your infantry is in the water or else it is not gonna work.
So you expect the ship player to be blind and not try to evade the torpedo?
Also if ship is like tanks and plane, then he can just spawn another ship and continue shelling the objective if the ship is destroyed.
Many players are against the game to go to cold war and dev probably won’t add it anyway consider War Thunder infantry will start from Korean war.
Don’t really see how are they related. Event is a event, nothing to do with animation. Not to mention it is just a small filler event which you can just ignore it if you don’t like it.
Many players think within certain limits, the developer is Profitably
That’s why we have stagnation and even degradation of the Game in some places.
Be happy)
Who is against the Cold War? What kind of ridiculous logic is that? It’s like BR1 players not wanting BR5 players.Also, infantry hasn’t been added to War Thunder yet, and it’s unclear when it will be released. Should we delete Enlisted now and just play War Thunder?
Anyone who’s playing a World War II game.
I want World War II in my World War II game, that’s why I play World War II game. I have no clue why I should want to have some Cold war nonsense in World War II game.
If I wanted to play Cold War, I would play a game focused on that.
This is not your game Buddy 
Maybe try to search for such topic in forum. You need to read more topic to know other player’s opinion.
Except br5 stuff are still ww2 era stuff, and those post war stuff like the addition of su-9 did gets backlash.
If you want to play cold war infantry you should go to War Thunder infantry when it is released since it starts from korean war, if you want to play WW2 infantry you should stay in Enlisted.