A single Kikka 800kg torpedo can destroy an entire ship.
That is how current map works. Unless you expect dev to put in a lot of effort to design new map specifically for it.
I don’t think it can carry a torpedo in War Thunder. Also I doubt how many players will bring planes that carries torpedo in the first place. Not to mention the ship can fire several salvo causing great damage before a plane tries to target it.
How is it related to our discussion lol? This is a mini event.
Why are some people in this forum ignoring the game’s shortcomings and looking for fault in those who tell the truth? That’s illogical.
800-1000 or 2000 kg torpedoes can be used against infantry , and hitting a ship with these torpedoes isn’t that difficult. Even an ordinary, unskilled player, even if their plane is destroyed, can launch a torpedo in the direction of the ship, and the torpedo will travel through the water, hit the ship, and inflict heavy damage or destroy it. I personally did this while playing War Thunder.
In the last two years, the Manchuria map and the addition of plane destruction and explosion effects, tank destruction animations, and running animations in the last update were good, but for such a long time span as two years, it’s quite little. Gaijin should have added all the vehicles and ships related to World War II last year, and also added Cold War elements this year. They should have also added building destruction animations and improved jumping animations, but Gaijin is adding ridiculous, pointless, and terrible events.
yes. ships would be viable only on pacific for both teams, otherwise only one team could get access to them(e.g. d-day). also it would serve no purpose besides indirect fire support operating on vast distances( minimum 1-2km) so you wouldnt even have visual confirmation on what you are shooting. also with other vehicles you can disembark and play as infantry and cap, with ship you cant. well you could if you want to get extra 200-3000 infantry in your squad…
In War Thunder, it’s possible to visually track the trajectory of a projectile fired from a ship. Furthermore, World War II ships could fire from distances of 15-42 km, and by carrying warplanes and armed amphibious vehicles, it was possible to be effective on land.
Except small map is a type of design instead of short coming. This game is fast pace and full of action, why should dev change the game design for you?
Unless your infantry is in the water or else it is not gonna work.
So you expect the ship player to be blind and not try to evade the torpedo?
Also if ship is like tanks and plane, then he can just spawn another ship and continue shelling the objective if the ship is destroyed.
Many players are against the game to go to cold war and dev probably won’t add it anyway consider War Thunder infantry will start from Korean war.
Don’t really see how are they related. Event is a event, nothing to do with animation. Not to mention it is just a small filler event which you can just ignore it if you don’t like it.
Many players think within certain limits, the developer is Profitably
That’s why we have stagnation and even degradation of the Game in some places.
Be happy)
Who is against the Cold War? What kind of ridiculous logic is that? It’s like BR1 players not wanting BR5 players.Also, infantry hasn’t been added to War Thunder yet, and it’s unclear when it will be released. Should we delete Enlisted now and just play War Thunder?
Anyone who’s playing a World War II game.
I want World War II in my World War II game, that’s why I play World War II game. I have no clue why I should want to have some Cold war nonsense in World War II game.
If I wanted to play Cold War, I would play a game focused on that.
This is not your game Buddy 
Maybe try to search for such topic in forum. You need to read more topic to know other player’s opinion.
Except br5 stuff are still ww2 era stuff, and those post war stuff like the addition of su-9 did gets backlash.
If you want to play cold war infantry you should go to War Thunder infantry when it is released since it starts from korean war, if you want to play WW2 infantry you should stay in Enlisted.
My friend, it’s currently impossible to play infantry in War Thunder, do you understand? On the other hand, is there a law that says it has to be an enlisted World War II game? The game’s name isn’t enlistedWW2, it’s just enlisted, meaning all kinds of weapons can be added, even modern warfare weapons. Restricting this is ridiculous. Those who don’t like it can go play BR1 Tunis forever, but that shouldn’t stop the game’s development.
we cant even get ±0 BR MM and you want to add more eras and more BR so you can dilute playerbase even more. also there is ton of stuff they can add for ww2 and there is absolutely no need for adding something outside ww2.
2 Likes
My friend, I’ve played War Thunder a bit too, and if you open the game, there are only a few planes and tanks left related to World War II. On the other hand, if there are things to add, they are warships related to World War II. Yes, in that sense you’re right, there are many things to add.If you like World War II (in BR1-BR5), you’ll play it but br 6-10 dont for you.
not everything is about vehicles. also you have france, italy, UK and loads of other minor nations for equipment that could be implemented into the game.
1 Like
France, Italy, and the United Kingdom? They were weak countries defeated in World War II. Italy was kept afloat by German aid from the very beginning, France was occupied by Germany, and the United Kingdom was devastated and destroyed by German planes and rockets. What did they have to offer? Why add them?
cause this is ww2 game.