- Yes
- No
Do not reduce the mag size of the APC, It already sucks because of the overheating
Just make it use a belt like the MG42 (100)
Do not reduce the mag size of the APC, It already sucks because of the overheating
Just make it use a belt like the MG42 (100)
I dont mind correcting stuff, but dont stop at just making it worse. (lowering ammo)
Please actually fix the damn overheat, traverse, elevation and depression angles while you are paying attention to it
gun shield looks taller too

If you arent interested in improving/correcting it accross the board. agree with main post
Except,
I for once, would like to get the half track fixed.
If it means:
Im curious does it mean that though? I didnt see those parts mentioned.
Ah yes. Nerfing the slowest apc that somehow still struggles climbing 5â° slopes. Nerfing a premium people paid for at that.
Brilliant.
Will you also correct the Stinger magazine to 100 and the Scotti to 25?
Of course you wonât⌠![]()
Iâm pretty sure you can currently get through 50 rounds without overheating pretty easily. So it should help with overheating regardless.
Still Iâm not sure how i feel about this. Is there any reason it canât have 100rd/150rd belt?
now that would actually be a good trade
problem is, itâs not mentioned.
All that is, is the rounds amount per load, going to be nerfed.
like @Myrm1don said:
The problem is not about the mag size.
APCs should have a unified standard.
If MG of Bren Gun Carrier deals standard damage( about 12 damage per bullet) , mg of sdkfz251 should also maintain the same damage.
Does it not? Feels like it kills in 1-2 bullets as usual MGs do
They should definitely correct its mag size. But remove the stupid overheating mechanics as well.
never said it does.
IF being a symptom of what we call, wishful thinking.
i forget that common sense isnât a thing that should be granted around here.
It was a question, not an accusationâŚ
Wishful thinking it is
pretty much.
and now that you mention it,
only reassures:
aka, they might just reduce the ammo and keep it as it is ![]()
AhhâŚdirected at what âtheyâ would do.
YesâŚsame page
actually yes, it does get a faster reload to compensate
no overheat change but your post about apc overheat is on my list of stuff to forward anyways
thatâs half a " relief ".
but thanks as usual for your honesty and update.
You can build ammo boxes on the shooting range to test weapon damage. Bren Gun Carrier needs 13 shots to break the ammo box, but sdkfz 251 needs 19 shots.
Originally, all the cars were extremely prone to overheating.
In one of the updates a few months ago, the machine guns on the Soviet and American transport trucks could no longer overheat rapidly.
I could even take the time to fire 200 rounds slowly before getting out of the vehicle.
However, the machine guns on German transport trucks would overheat after firing only 3 to 5 rounds.
If we can fix the overheating issue, it would be a good thing.
Also, regarding the transport trucks, it seems that both the Soviet Union and the United States used 12.7-caliber guns, but the damage caused was relatively low.
This is definitely not the damage level that a heavy-caliber machine gun should have.
If it can be fixed, that would be a good thing.
Yeah the M2 (at least on the M3 Lend-Lease) is fairly rubbish against infantry, worse damage than the Madsen!
Having said that I destroyed a Pz.II with it yesterday (which it should be able to do)