And the orientation of the aircrafts should be consistent and neat
3 Likes
I’m still hoping to see an aerial accident, 2 or 3 of those crashing togheter…
It MUST be possible. Since stuff like spawn crashing planes on carriers is possible, that scenario must be plausible too.
I’d laughso much…
2 Likes
Actually there’s a hilarious clip on reddit of a couple of c47s getting entangled and flat spinning to the ground. It is epic…ill see if i can find
*edit here you go
https://www.reddit.com/r/enlistedgame/comments/130xb4i/so_that_was_terrifying/
LOLOL epic
4 Likes
Nice, and see people, he bailed late and still alive?
AHAH Now that’s what i’m talking about! H&G grade craziness!
1 Like
That’s a lot of self-projection that you just laid out before the community. Wow dude. You want a hug? I wonder when you’re going to stop stalking every message that I write.
more like spending hours talking to silly people who make up fantasy scenarios that didn’t apply to the match that I played, and then trying to tell me “how I should have responded”.
I spent hours interacting with silly people, who are defending their precious $60 investments, who will cry like little girls, if the developers NERF their paratroopers.
I spent hours discussing how this game has been deviating further away from it’s original description, while adapting a stronger presence of fantasyland-like scenarios. A hybrid of Call of Duty, Battlefield 5, and HLL.
Like I said before… it’s just a matter of time before we get Red Dot sights, BlackHawk helicopters, and Atomic Bombs.
Gentlemen, when mosquitoes fall on the point, I recommend using a spray. The flamethrower is the perfect case for deratization.
1 Like
You are very entertaining. So much for now wasting your time.
I wonder when you’re going to start providing actual, tangible solutions.
You know, other than just whining because you lost your precious advantage to slaughter newbies. Just a thought.
Oh they did, it’s just they contradicted your position and you refused to even consider the possibility that you might have been a factor in your loss. So, of course, you invalidated them.
As stated multiple times, calling an entire game mechanic an exploit is a serious accusation, one you need real and plentiful evidence to support. Not one bad match.
Still not the flex you think this is. None of us need to defend our purchases if we’re enjoying them.
What…? That’s rich coming from the dude who lost a match, then declared paras both P2W and an exploit without realizing that those two terms are mutually exclusive, and then yelled at anyone who dared disagree.
Also, what’s this?
Oh. Weird. That doesn’t sound like crying.
No, not really. Nowhere does it say Enlisted is supposed to be 100% accurate. It’s a video game. It’s entertainment. And if you believe that, why spend hours arguing in the first place? Can’t that energy be devoted to something more productive?
I want to say that’s a joke, but I really can’t tell with you. None of this is constructive or helps the devs improve the game. If you truly believe that, why the hell are you still here? Does all this complaining get you anywhere? Does it make you feel better?
I can answer that for you if you’d like. But Forlorn’s right, soon you’ll completely forget paratroopers exist and you’ll find something new to whine about. Instead of just, I don’t know, playing something you actually enjoy.
1 Like
Sounds like you can recreate it too. Going to try it with a few buddies tonight!!..if it works time to go for the 4 plane stackup!!!
2 Likes
Here you go.
Here’s the scenario:
I’m playing Axis Ver-sur-Mer: Invasion Mode
- Allied team continues to use paratroopers to spawn on the edge of our grey zone (destroying our rally points, and cutting off reinforcements from the spawn (It’s what I would do, if I paid $60 for the squad)
-Doesn’t matter what we do… We are getting spammed by HVAR’s from the sky, getting spammed by three tanks (yes, there were three on the battlefield at one single time), and whenever we killed the vehicles, the paratroopers spawned from the rear.
-By the forth objective, I decided to play in my Tiger tank (which is when I killed all three tanks in less than 45 seconds).
-But then I got blown up by an HVAR…
-We lose the 4th objective, and I respawn behind the 5th objective
-As I’m in the process of building a rally point, a Paratrooper squad lands directly infront on me (right on the edge of the Grey Zone).
-Fortunately for me, I was down in a hole, and the player didn’t see me. (So I wiped his squad)
-But… had I not been there, the player would have ran through the back door of the building, and probably kill everybody inside with his 100rd drum mag.
-After the player got squad wiped, he respawned in his Calliope, and spammed the building with his rocket pods.
-They won (obviously)
Here’s some highlights from the match.
First: The three tanks
Second: Caught in the act
It was a sad night for the Premium Players 
Look at all those PC players
Haha, made a report of it.
Actually happen every now and then.
https://community.gaijin.net/issues/p/enlisted/i/JNhBLYcSweXC
Tranport planes collides in the Pacific
If you deploy paratroopers at the same time in the Pacific(at least Alligator Creek North) everything will end in tears.
Planes are spawned from the same location and immediately collide. End result is obvious.
2 Likes
Oh that happend to me, my plane crashed to other plane, we both were in grazyone soo we teleported on battlefield, but without our crates. 
Sadly i dont have any screenshot.
It was funny experience. 
1 Like
Hmm that’s an awful lot of making up fantasies in your head, most of which doesn’t really have anything to do with paras. You’re just complaining about losing now. Let’s break this down.
What’s your point? This is an excellent strategy. A single soldier can do this without needing to buy a premium squad, which that alone invalidates the P2W argument.
Ah, look, an actual problem you could have spent your time on. Plane spam is an issue that could be pretty easily fixed. Look at the Pacific, where planes are still fun to use but not a menace for the ground below.
Also, you Axis players love to spam Bf 110s and Ju 188s just as much as the Allies. It’s just as annoying.
Then… why are you complaining about there being 3 tanks if it was so easy to take them out?
Well yeah. That’s called counterattacking. Would you still complain if an M4 76 flanked you and took you out?
So… what? Paras are fine now because you took them out?
Maybe. They also could have done that by spawning on the ground and flanking. They also could have done it with a flamethrower, a 30-round Thompson, a grenade/Molotov, or a few cans of good ol’ Willie Pete.
Not sure what this is supposed to prove. The Calliope’s pretty damn good, sure, but it’s literally impossible not to notice and it’s still just a standard Sherman, so it’s killed easily by any Axis tank or plane.
Also, your clips don’t really do anything You’re fixated on building the rally point when you should be looking around. Some dude could have shot you in the back with a Springfield.
I’m very confused. You’re just explaining a match. Nowhere did the paras “exploit” the game and cause a loss like you claimed. That’s also not Ver-sur-Mer, and you won. So… that’s weird.
Wow that’s hilarious 
It would make more sense if they all flew in formation when spawning together, you know what I mean? Instead of just flying in every direction
Lol. Nothing like Call of Duty Warzone para-drops, directly ontop of the enemy.
haha. Look at you trying to dictate what’s worth talking about, and what’s not.
Ah yes. Deflecting the issue.
Ah yes… Killing a tanker, and he immediately spawns in a plane just to get revenge with HVAR Spam
Such high quality gameplay and immersion.
I never said they were invincible/immortal. I said they are being used to exploit matches.
Yes, but all of these things require time, effort, and/or skill. Traditionally… if a player wants to flank the enemy, and try to get to their rally points, then the player has to fight and/sneak their way behind enemy lines. Traditional flankers have a much higher probability of being detected, and encountering Anti-personnel mines and other defenses, compared to Call of Duty paratroopers who can be deployed anywhere they want.
Pay $60, and you can spawn behind the enemy!
And then you can accuse players of having “skill issues” for not camping behind their own objective, staring at the sky while waiting for paratroopers to randomly spawn throughout the match! Such genius strategy!
How many posts exist within this forum, from players who are crying about camping teammates? But by your logic… camping is REQUIRED. Because you gotta have people camping/guarding the rear, to protect the rest of the team from para-troopers who are spawning on the edge of the grey zone (near the opposite team’s spawn).
And also… by your logic… Players should be aware of EVERYTHING at all times (always aware and ready to shoot down paratroopers, and aircraft, and tanks, and infantry from all FOUR directions.
By your logic… we should have eyes in the backs of our heads, and on top.
I’m pretty sure the only players who are aware of EVERYBODY… are the cheaters/hackers.
LMFAO!!! This guy is criticizing me for building a rally point, and says I should be staring at the sky!
(My bad. My bad. I still haven’t adapted to this new Call of Duty style, game-mode)
You’re a dumb fuck. I literally just spawned, and was on my way to defend the objective. But first, I stopped to build a rally point so that my teammates could spawn closer, and not have to run 200m.
Are you familiar with engineers, and the importance of building rally points for your team?
Or are you a selfish player?
Nothing gets passed you!
You’re funny. Again, what happened to not wasting your time?
I get you’re trying really hard to be funny, but this isn’t working for you.
Not quite, Enlisted Messiah. Planes in their current form are far more effective at clearing points than paras ever will be because there’s no way to stop it in the moment. Either hope there’s an AA gun or fighter already, and if not, you’re screwed.
So if you are seriously going to argue that planes are less of a problem than paras, you have lost your mind or have never played Enlisted. They’ve literally been a pain in the ass since day one. But I’m not going to call them an exploit just because I don’t like them.
You brought up the tank thing. Still have no clue why.
Is this not deflecting the issue either? Remember what I said?
You don’t need a plane to revenge kill someone. It’s just the quickest way which is why everyone does it. And remember:
You didn’t say it, you’ve implied it. And if that’s true, then you’re admitting that it’s possible to counter them. And since you won’t listen to anyone with this exploit BS, here’s the official definition for a video game exploit:
So, according the actual definition of an exploit, paras cannot be an exploit because they are not a bug, and they are being used as intended. If the devs did not intend for them to drop on objectives, they would not have been given the option to.
They also cannot be P2W either, because that would mean they were added intentionally to give paying players an unfair advantage. Even if that were the case, they’re still not P2W because there are numerous free ways to clear an objective.
This also invalidates both the exploit and P2W argument because you’re admitting there’s other ways to flank and clear a point.
Yes, they do. But if a team is vigilant and capable enough to spot a player sneaking their way through brush, then they are more the capable of spotting a parachute drop. I don’t know what part of this you don’t get. The sky has literally no cover, no protection. You cannot argue that someone can just casually spot a player sneaking through bushes, but not a bunch of of parachuting soldiers in the sky.
Like dude… read what you write before you post it.
That’s subjective. You have no statistical evidence of that. I can’t speak for everyone, but flanking with a flametrooper is far more effective from what I’ve seen. Paras… not so much…
A large number of people have completed the event and have both free para squads by now. That is no longer an advantage held by paying players anymore.
That’s not what anyone said, and that’s not what situational awareness is. You need to be aware of all threats, wherever they may come from, to be a successful enlisted player. Most good players are already looking up to see if they’re about to be blown to pieces by attacker planes. It’s really not the hard to be aware of your surroundings.
Umm… no. Just no. I can’t think of you’re getting this from.
No. It’s simple. You see paras, you either intercept them or you risk losing your rallies. Defending is more than just camping on the stairs in the objective.
Yes, exactly. You had to do this even before paras were added. You’re trying to make this sound complicated when it really, truly isn’t. If you think it is, I really don’t know what else to tell you.
And then the point flew right over your head just like a squad of paras
You didn’t read what I said. The point sails over your head once more.
If that’s what you want to call it, sure.
Woah, tough guy alert.
This has absolutely nothing to do with what you said. Like, not even a little bit.
Ok…?
I got all the time in the world, pal. Please, keep giving me more material
It’s a good thing that words have multiple meanings, and/or broader definitions than your little excerpt. Particularly definition #2 and #3
Here are other definitions of the word *exploit:
*
Neither of those definitions can be smoothly applied to the situation you’re describing. They’re far too broad. Using paratrooper squads has nothing to do with “doing the right thing.” That’s why I used the video game definition specifically. Nice try, though.
Hopefully you will truly stop wasting your time and find a game you actually care about.