DF why do you think adding japan to BR5 is good?dont do that yet,focus on making BR1-4 playable before making them fight even worse stuff

Yes please stop responding to me my reason of doing things is to reach certain people not to reach everyone unless you can actually see what I’m talking about

1 Like

LMAO. We’ll see. If you continue to flood the forums with BS I may not be able to resist.

M2 carbine = Japanese federov or Shisei Type Hei model 1934
lmg


M1919A6= type 92 or Field-modification of Type 98 swivel machine gun
image
image

P47s= A6M5 Hei
A6M6c
A7M2
D4Y2
J2M3
N1K2-J
N1K2-Ja
All of these planes can carry The Type 3 No.1 Mod.28 Mk.1 rocket
image
image
and
A6M5 Hei
A6M6c
A7M2
J2M3
N1K2-J
N1K2-Ja
These planes can carry The Type 3 No.6 Mod.27 Mk.1 rocket

so Japan really only struggles in tanks only tank that’s in warthunder and worthy of BR5 in enlisted are HO-RI both production and prototype and Heavy tank NO.6 (Tiger ) other than that th devs have to make their own models which they are too lazy to do it I suggested Chi-ri with 88 mm gun (type 99 AA gun) pure fantasy never existed Americans thought chi-ri’s turret is too big(because of auto loader) so they must be trying to use 88 mm gun like Germans do they have 88 mm gun yes they do and that’s it
and CHI-SE real project but we don’t know much about only that it was to house 105 mm cannon like HO-RI so my best guess bigger Chi-ri or if you want to add fantasy to it bigger chi-ri with sloped armor

Also japan has a AT launcher that can pen 120 mm of steel more than M9 bazooka and enough to pen Persings front armor(101) and super pershing’s too and Ho-ri has 233 mm pen at 10 meters with 200 grams of TNT that means everything it hits gonna become ash
type 4 rocket launcher with 90 mm rocket
image

3 Likes

so what? TNT and explosive charges can destroy tanks, so we have to ignore the imbalance in tanks?