After “making Enlisted a better place no.71” a lot of weapons had their rpm changed and the Devs claimed that they’d been provided data by players that had proved that the old rpm was incorrect. But the Devs didn’t provide any sources that could be used to confirm the changes, nor did they make it very clear where players could look to find them.
So if anyone from the community or dev team could provide any sources for the following weapons that’s definitely proves their rpm needed to be changed I’d really appreciate it.
Some guy dug up a piece of paper the japs printed out that from my understanding was for an aircraft variant.
THEN… deleted the post because of bad feedback yet they choose to adjust it and make it worse so the average drone thinks it’s good now because it’s 10x worse than what it was before.
Type 100/40 (with the link to the thread on this same forum) and some additional info - 700 for production model, 735 for earlier prototypes that are not present in the game
Type 1 (with the scan of a document) - 619
Type 2 (mention of a book by J.Sayama that mentions that it had high rate of fire, when average would be that of Type 96/99 at ~550, and scans of documents) - 750, 820 for a tank variant that I believe is also not in the game
Type 99 MG (scan of a Japanese document and American manual for the paratrooper version)
Type 100 MG (scans of Japanese documents)
and justifications for weight changes that did happen, caliber change for foreign SMGs that happened partially (Japanese MP34 is still left, along with the “MP28”), and velocity and BR changes that, I believe, were not touched at all
, also they claimed to have been provided “more accurate” data.
