Speaking of next campaign, i got very interesting result. Sure pacific was on top, but it was very splited. Pacific campaign only got 48%. Two 12% are invasion of France and Sino-Japanese war. Two 8% are winter war and Stalingrad. Lastly, they got one vote for each grece front, invasion of sicily and i don’t care.
Moat of people choosed tired of another soviet vs german campaign, by getting 13 votes. In second place, repeating gears. Grind only got 4 votes. There are few other reasons:
“I’m fine with it, it’s just not a top choice when there’s other campaigns that haven’t been touched yet.”
“Yet another urban full auto clown fiesta. It is not necessary to have Berlin clone.”
“I just more like to play french warfare more.”
Lastly, about the aim of Darkflow. The most voted one is polishing the game. At second place, there is the adding new stuffs. Two 12% are respectively balancing and adding new feature. One vote for each better AI and improving existing features.
Awesome information! I hope developers and such look at things like this in the future and I would even say they should consider putting out some more polls as the game has evolved since 2017
although stalingrad will inevitably be the next campaign they add, i hope that the next campaigns they propose to add will be chosen through current votes.
How many votes did you got in total? 25…
Console or pc players?
reddit, forum or discord population, Or all of them?
If it was 1 vote for better AI and that alone is 4% on the total pie, means not many votes were gathered, so this shouldn’t be take into consideration.
You need a huge demografic to lay a prediction/conclusion. Not 1 single vote be 4% of total voters and lay a conclusion around that. That’s 25 users over Atleast 500k players that played on last event with the data the game devs did share with us.
Atleast 500k
You cant judge an answer and lay data with 25 users over 500k possible answers atleast.
Are you sure that 25 voters even play?
How long do they play? What servers, what sides, what platform they choose to play?
Why one should take such data into consideration when 25 users did vote.
1 vote should be way less than 1 %. At any given poll for a reliable conclusion.
And that alone, shall conclude that this is useless.
I, on other hand insentivise you to keep doing this, but, with a wider demographic and gather more votes doing so befor a conclusion.
Also, the way a choise is presented, befor hand lay the result befor even a vote was made.
Sorry, but don’t think everyone responded, I know I certainly didn’t, so this survey is not balanced.
I would not want a pacific campaign, as for copy and paste, that is only a few people saying this, do we just ignore the main part of war because interchangeable weapons? Not everything would be copy and paste, perhaps other weapons and vehicles introduced.
I hope Gaijin does not recognise this survey as full and based on everyone’s opinion
And why exactly would you like it over the Pacific? The weapons that could be added with Stalingrad could be added on to existing campaigns. As for the maps, a better solution would be to somehow add them on to Moscow rather than splitting the playerbase with a copy and paste camapign.
As for gameplay, it’ll be exactly the same as Berlin.
Meanwhile the pacific would bring new weapons, factions, terrain, different gameplay and potentially quite a few new players.
There was the entire rest of the literal world. You are ignoring entire continents of conflicts with the same faction(s) again. Not saying Stalingrad isnt important, it 100% is, but it can be expanded into Moscow
Well i’m just showing what i got. I can’t force people to participate. People tend to not answer a survey if it is long and takes time to think about it. Sure I also want bigger echantillon and more detailed question. I already made few more interesting questions, but i removed it cuz i didn’t want to make the poll too long.
Even in the forum it’s usually briefly ten nicknames who write comments and discuss. The playerbase itself is small.
The participation of them on foruns, reddit discords and so on is. And it’s understandable why.
Why one, should participate in something, when they only answer on the day they announce something and then, it’s total silence for another week or more.
I missed this unofficial poll.
We need a poll for every player. Popping up in the game. To make more of a representation of all the different players.
That’s what I think. Thanks for trying though.
25 people out of 500.000 isn’t really showing who wants what and what the direction of the game should be.
This poll you did was a great idea, had i known about it i certainly would have participated. Maybe you could announce the next one a week before hand in the mess room and suggestion section in BOLD letters in the heading, with instructions of where and how to participate.
Again, great idea.
