I’m only opening this to tell @108402958 that I sincerely enjoyed our match together, and I look forward to meet him again in battle. Next time, I’ll try to put more effort in fighting than in talking 
Also, I’m curious to know if he kept up with his words and actually proceeded to mass-report every single member of his team. XD
Jokes aside:
I met this guy in my team in a Fortress invasion defense as Axis in Tunisia. The matchmaker made me join in progress, when the 1st cap had already fallen and the Allies were dominating. Also, I had a task to kill planes, so I kept out of the brawl and built AA to hunt down an annoying SBD that was buzzing around.
Meanwhile, poor PTFO was actually playing up to his name and doing his best to carry our team, as he was consistently 1st on our side of the scoreboard by a wide margin.
But at some point he lost his temper, and he started raging in chat so hard that I couldn’t help myself and ended up spending more time trolling him back than fighting for the rest of the match. (As you can imagine, we lost).
So, here I just want to say: no hard feelings, and despite me trolling in chat, I understand the pain of being the one struggling to carry hard when the rest of the team doesn’t even try.
2 Likes
Seems like normal Tunisia axis game.
3 Likes
I can understand what he felt, but raging in chat is wrong, as it is not the players’ fault if there is no matchmaking that guarantees balanced teams (and then I doubt that the axis bots care)
1 Like
But if you try it in Moscow as allies you often unclog waterfall of cyrilic messages
Matchmaking per lvl wouldn’t work… it really depends on where the player base decides to be. Imagine, I’m around lvl 10 only in both factions in Normandy, using vanilla squads. But I’m end game in every other campaigns. If they implement a MM based on levels, then I weep for my opponents in Normandy 
1 Like
the fact remains that to start developing one there should be a level based matchmaking to get feedback, otherwise nothing is done out of nothing
I’m against any MM based on lvl. First, because it wouldn’t work because of ppl like me who have mastered other campaigns and dominate using starter bolt actions. Second, it would make the game boring or annoying. At starter lvls it would be sooo boring and you’d lose the awe you get when you see powerful enemies having nice toys you want to unlock too. At late lvls, only tryhards would remain, as such forget the concept of casual play, wich I enjoy after looooong days of work (12 hrs shifts, I need to relax)
1 Like
so you want to have matchmaking without using basic matchmaking to get feedback, i didn’t understand 
I mean there could be some sort of MM… Just not based on INDIVIDUAL lvls.
One I proposed that would work is balance the TOTAL amount of lvl per team. So a lvl 5 could see someone lvl 30, but his own team would also have a lvl 30 in it. This way teams would be fair BUT not boring like “everyone must be around same lvl with mirror equipment 
”
3 Likes
what you have proposed can also be fine but the basis is, you always start from something to create something, the question is when they start working on it?
They keep saying “soon” 
But I’d rather have them create a poll for something this important and game changing. Because if they add something like “everyone will only play vs others having +/-3 lvls difference” Then I’ll just stop playing Enlisted completely.
I don’t want to be bored at lower lvls, and I don’t want to be ONLY with sweating tryhards at late lvls. I like how it is now, because contrary to what most believe, balance issue is player based… it’s not about equipment and lvls. (A starter lvl 5 guy can be top 3 if he plays smart, while a lvl 30 can be a useless weight for his team by just sniping or playing cas)
4 Likes
they asked how to introduce motorbikes into the game, trust them at least at the beginning is also in their interests a functioning MM
2 Likes
Yes, but sadly it’s the only poll I’ve seen in a while. Thing is, the poll worked, players are satisfied because the devs asked them.
They need to create more polls
4 Likes
I was just surprised with Tunisia and finally had really great battle as axis there. Those 40 min. of intense fighting that are relatively common in Normandy was welcome change. So thank you to all participants. Rally points were rare on our side but when we finally had one it pushed us up. No grants so tank combat was balanced. And on top of that I finally unlocked engineers.
