No. Japanese are not inferior about primary weapons; mg, ba, sniper, pistol, semis, etc…
Nor germans or us/uk.
If any facion have overpowered infantry weapons i bet on soviets but not at game cracker degree.
Only real problme for japs is their tanks are inferior but devs will add even more prototypes like chi nu if you looknat editor.
These " nerf x side or buff y side" kind of not well thought demands come from anger and frustration from unbalance matchmaking if not skill issue.
Remember the normandy 1 year before or pacific in first weak.
Everybody was demanding “nerf japan us is losing badly”
Now its the opposite bcs Tryhards and premius shifted to us after they completed japan.
1 year before werhraboos were whining about normandy but now the allies are whining
Japanese and german weapons are optimal for stationary use meanwhile western ally weapons are optimal for dynamic warfare
And its not hard to get used to this change this is not rocket science
Two core problmes hits the game but not overpowered weapons or one side is op/weak
playerbase is not scattered homogeniously in every campaign and faction
non existent MM
Devs must implement decent mm immediately.
After that you will see more than %90 of these gibberish will end.
There’s been a few times now where the player base has done a complete 180 on a campaign without batting an eye, then saying the faction everyone said was the best for the past 3 months is somehow bad all around.
All true if the game dont force you do 200m for reach a capzone, capzone wo let player hidden their bot under some hause force attacker do a hide and seek,and the 200m of walking make every weapon outiside BA suited only for cqc thanks to the dispersion
So there is no imbalance at all in the equipment and currently the one wo “mass murder the other team more fast win”
I already seeyed sufficient early normandy for say pacific is balanced on current equipment, on player with a brain in both side wo understand that use only smg dont let you win, no i think not
Idk what you want say because im not complain on pacific balance, the exactly the opposite i suppose read too much complain have a negative effect on you
There are obviously equipment imbalances. It is necessarily the case unless you want both sides using the same stuff. The question is whether those imbalances are excessive.
They literally added different numbers of spawns for different factions, and increased cap times for US (since revoked) to alleviate the winrate problem. So you are wrong to state that Japan is not inferior. They have been inferior by design for a long time.
US was never losing because japanese equipment needed nerfing though, they were losing because nobody played on that faction & each US team had 3-4 human players. The equipment is not the main factor there.
Both sides are at least functional as things are now, in terms of loadouts. I actually enjoy the US being more difficult to play against now that they have players, but I still think the maps need work, and I want hard faction imbalance to disappear.
Longer queues & less bots, I say. Then both factions can play by same rules and have similar equipment power. But that has not been the way of things so far.
