Japan will probably get the kurogane with 4 seats and probably type 96 or type 99 LMG, but I want it be as TT: Add Kurogane Type 95 4-seats Phaeton - #3 by Eule99
what you think about a Scoped LMG?
question, just quesiton.
if a dude did with an isuzu truck, I guess someone could strap it to a kurogane
1 Like
thancks
still we talking about premiun content, Kubel can be also something ‘‘smugled’’ in japanase arsenal.
but anyway… Research is needed.
but it should be with no scope, because as you can see it’s a type 97 with no scope attached, but it could work, I can ask to @Aussie-Tachanka maybe he know
1 Like
i guess 30 bullets is not a good thing,
when i go jeep, i use has much supressive fire i can, because like i say, if someone pick up a stone and trwo in you head you driver die. simple that.
so 30 bullets will supress very very poorle. maybe a German HMG will solve it. if possible a Japanese counterpart whit 200 bullet plus.
that’s why the only idea for a possible premium it’s the kurogane PICKUP version, who thanks a modeling (who it’s based in a real thing) show how looks with the type 92 mg
3 Likes
one second, but i liked de type 92 mg i post a image here.
see he has a belt feed system whicth means = 200 bullets or even 250 bullets
trust me, in a rieder content this firepower is critical. to supress has much is possible to avoid get kill.
once the barrel is to hot or bullets is over, get the fuck out there.
good, we still the car it-self.
Toyota AK10 might be the guy. whit type 92 mg, some reiforced armor will be good to, hope carry 4 guys. then, only then we are talking
It certainly should be possible to mount any of the infantry based light machine guns on top of one of the Isuzu truck roof tops, whether they be scoped or without a scope. It’d essentially be affixing one of the few examples of HMG mounts that allow for left right and vertical traversal.
An interesting possibility if we wanted to give Japan something unique to counteract their typically small magazine sizes of 30 rounds could be something like the Type 38 HMG with an attached ballistic shield.
There’s also a shield for the Type 3 machine gun as an option too, but this one provides better overall protection
One machine gun that could be somewhat better in terms of magazine capacity than what we have on the current Kurogane with the Type 11 is the vehicle mounted version. The type 91 VMG with its 45/50 round hopper magazine. (I’ve seen the source contested by numerous authors that it’s either 45/50 rounds. I’m potentially coming into acquisition of an original Type 11 handling manual so perhaps it might give a proper answer there.)
Or we could opt for something experiemntal that didn’t go very far into development or production, that being the VMG version of the Type 3 machine gun, the Type 97.
The Type 97 was an attempt to replace the Type 91 by converting the Type 3 HMG to use semi rigid belt links that could be as long as we liked, so let’s say 100 rounds+
A photo of a modified type 3 HMG intended to use said semi rigid belts.
1 Like
Additionally there’s a prototype belt fed machine gun of Japan I will plan to write about in the coming months I hope
good job, i see people aleardy did,t know much of Rieder tactics so i going to use some free time i have RIGHT NOW, to explain, soon i place the topic in topic. because i see people don,t realy understand the basic concepts of motorized guerrilha warfare.
please i not a master in military sciecy, but i willing to share what i know.
here has promised
1 Like
yay
1 Like
Too bad it will be taking once in an update premium addition if this slop gets added… stop being ignorant
Why should the premium be worse? You’d have to back up into people if you wanted to use the mg and it’s not practical for defending yourself from targets ahead of you
they are a lot of examples in the game of premium units who are worse than tt or event so, why not?
Dude, easy.
the discusion about light vehicle warfare is older you think, it starter when the enlisted has no BR sistem, whit a premiun Bike squad in tunisia theater, of course the bike it self has trash. but for a BRI light vehicle it,s ok right? and after all many comunity menbers see it,s potention a long time a go.
then come APCs, that are used very often in enlisted matches, we are now in a Jeep update, it,s great adition just need to be polished in some details. what i realy asking IS, give a premiun jeep to every faction.
check this tuturial here, has for what a light vehicle is, it,s about to infantry oriented players. how trade they tanks/planes for a extra inf AND logistics means, many times a APC. and it works. since you can also fight on foot if it,s need. something you can,t do whit a tanks/aircraft.
there are many tactics around. still if you love tank or planes, don,t be ashamed. we those assets even more that APCs and jeeps, the greatest glitch is that they DO NOT use heavy vehicle cap. so even so, there is absulute no problen in anyone using they, since you have less copetetion to take you tank/aircraft.
cheers.
Pardon, is that what you called USSR?..
That’s how some languages abbreviate it and people get accustomed to it even when speaking English
fr. Union des républiques socialistes soviétiques
esp. Unión de Repúblicas Socialistas Soviéticas
Ig that both options should be shortened to URSS, but not URRS?
True that! Must be double typo then or 3D chess