In War Thunder, this armored vehicle’s turret horizontal traverse speed is 25 degrees per second.
However, in Enlisted, this armored vehicle’s turret horizontal traverse speed is 14 degrees per second.
If this armored vehicle were to receive an upgrade to its turret traverse speed matching that of the Puma in War Thunder, It could become an excellent light armored vehicle for dealing with infantry.
Meanwhile I’m pretty sure they increased the m8 Scott’s traverse speed… however I’m not sure on this but it felt extremely slow in wt but I didn’t have max crew
https://community.gaijin.net/issues/p/warthunder/i/BiF3cvxtLBRn
This is the source that helped bring about the adjustment to this armored vehicle’s turret traverse speed in War Thunder.
It appears that the same applies to Enlisted as well.
I just tested it with the M8, and there was no difference in turret traverse speed between having only the gunner and having a full crew. It was terribly slow in both cases.
Well to be fair on that update they also nerfed the Tigers 2 from 42km/h speed to 39km/h and also nerfed the HP from 700 to 600
If the Tiger II’s textures—currently marred by excessive dirt and poor Zimmerit detailing—were replaced with the high-quality textures recently introduced in War Thunder, and if the Tiger II (P) received a name change, added turret-side tracks, and an engine nerf, the tank would likely look quite decent.
However, to my knowledge, the only surviving field manual regarding the Tiger II’s engine—which serves as the basis for that engine nerf—dates back to the early period of its deployment; no manuals from the later deployment period remain. Consequently, I question whether that nerf was truly justified.
At the very least, I hope that the engine upgrade and the replacement of the outdated textures are implemented simultaneously for both Tiger II variants.