this tank is basically the m1 garand with a GL equivalent.
its only put to BR4 because of the missile launcher.
the only disadvantage of this tank in BR4 is that infantry with BR4-5 MG can easily disable the missile launcher

- Yes
- No
this tank is basically the m1 garand with a GL equivalent.
its only put to BR4 because of the missile launcher.
the only disadvantage of this tank in BR4 is that infantry with BR4-5 MG can easily disable the missile launcher

Yes please
Yea and its a really good HE clicker with it + the 75mm and downtiering it would make it utter cancer i dont want to imagine a tunisia game with it. If the 105 isnt getting moved to br 4 like i suggested allies br 3 will have another completely broken clicker.

You gotta be joking with this one
yes i’m not that high iq but its not a bait
well im just suggesting nothing much
You are absolutely delusional if you think this belongs at 3.
in your logic because it can be destroied by AT gun,so why not BR1?
chi ha short gun would be understand if someone wants to br2 because of paper armor and no aphe ammo and overpreassure depedancy and be punished for bringing wrong tank against soviets but that thing seriously ? both sherman 105 and calliope is worse than chi ha short cannon , be reasonable