one it would remove many of the prototype weapons
two it will allow BR 1-2 BR 3-4 ques
This would create new player safe lobbies
it would reduce BR clubbing one and two by three
while avoid BR3 and 4 being clubbed by 5
Japan and America who suffer when up tiered to BR5 would no longer suffer
8 Likes
IMO BR 5 is still fun. (even though i dont like excessive prototypes in the tech tree being bread and butter)
But I do think it should be an Island (by itslef)
1 Like
No that is an awful idea I pretty much only play BR V cause it is the most fun.
Having BR V as its own BR is an idea but it could fragment the player base undesirably. BR II is a good BR if you really do not want late war or experimental equipment.
This would not occur, as there are many that enjoy the lower end weapons, playing with bolts can just be plain fun in Enlisted for example.
The others are plausible, but Im not sure possible due to people spending money on those BR V premiums. It would be possible to move BR V to its own matchgroup and I do support that. We just have to convince Darkflow that the 3rd matchgroup is what is needed for balance.
1 Like
What the?
Remove BR5 and this will fix seal clubbing wtf, would increase it
Remove BR 5 i leave game, play for 3y, get to top gear, and only play BR 5, and you want to remove it, after all that time, and $2,000k i have put into game wtf are you smoking, for such a suggestion, why should i be forced to play BR at lower lvls?
And BR 5 by it self, and then you wont be joining BR5 games to be clubbed,
by playing in BR3, in hope of being down tiered, to seal club BR1-3, in which you get up tiered to BR 5, and then desert?, and your answer is to remove BR5 
Edit, nice thread topic title, change from OG title 
nice save 
2 Likes
the fact is BR5 is op
Rifles OP
SMG replaced by AR’s op
BR5 tanks op
MG on the fence if BR5 are op
Planes as well on the fence
Why i suggested removing it is because of the air quote “low population”
2 Likes
Is end game, its meant to be OP, is why i play it, even though some days i get obliterated, but its challenging.
This joining of BR5 games, By BR 3, people, then deserting, would simply be avoided, if, they played BR2.
Then BR 5 would fill nicely, there’s more than, enough, play BR 5.
1 Like
I played only BR 2 for the first several months. Now my eyes have wandered to BR 3 and 4 
Still enjoying myself (cos I have alot of stuff), but I do think it would be much more fun to make BR 5 an Island.
Br 1 with 2
Br 3 with 4
Br 5
BR -+0 would be amazing IMO…but good luck getting that when cant even get the above.
4 Likes
yeah i don’t want to be limited to bolt action rifles
telling me to play 40% of the game only and letting you keep the other 60% is real greedy
1 Like
I have no issues, if you do play BR3 and then play BR 5, just don’t desert, when you know, it could of been avoided, by playing BR 2.
2 Likes
But there are a ton of interesting and unique stuff in BR 3~4 that I’d love to play. But using them just puts you at a disadvantage with the current queues.
Either having separate BR 1+2, BR 3+4, and BR 5 queues, or just straight up ±1 BR matchmaking is really needed to make every BR reasonably comfortable to play. Let us enjoy all the various equipment in this game. The sheer equipment variety is what really makes Enlisted stand out in the over-saturated WW2 shooter market.
3 Likes
it would be nice to have a break between “Semi Autos” and “select fire” rifles
and a break between “High end SMGS” and “Automatic Rifles”
and ofcourse tanks
there is alot of iconic and fun stuff at 3 and 4
You certainly notice when at BR 3 taking your garand vs Hei Select fires for example lol
or thompson vs STG
or Churchill/sherman/t-34/kv-1 vs Tiger II lol
4 Likes
Seperate island is terrible idea.
Matches should be either ±1 MM or ±0 MM.
Otherwise BR1 and BR3 are going to be literally always in disadvantage. You just relocate the problem to somewhere else.
1 Like
But if it was ±0 MM then all BR be a island
1 Like
BR 1 is already “always” at a disadvantage, and BR 3 often at a disadvantage (its not 50/50)
How do you figure? BR 1 would only benefit from this. Yes BR 3 would lose Clubbing rights, But most of its equipment is not much different than BR 4 (a few vehicles exempt)
3 Likes
Well, obv. For BR1 and BR5 there should be exception of having chance to get only pure BR1/BR5 matches if ±1 MM is going to be implemented.
So it should like something this:
BR1
BR1 - BR2
BR2 - BR3
BR3 - BR4
BR4 - BR5
BR5
But I still hope we are going to get ±0 MM one day.
3 Likes
And then they can be islands again
Yeah, but without the main point why I think
BR 1-2
BR 3-4
BR 5
matchmaking is terrible.
Otherwise we can just make BR1, BR2 and BR3. And there’s not going to be any difference literally.
It’s going to be ±0 MM but one BR will have a much bigger power difference where the meta will be absolutely clear. And a lot of things just won’t be played at all.
And there’s not going be any reason why to label BR1/2 and BR3/4 separately.
This isn’t solution, you are just going to move meta somewhere else.
1 Like
I could see myself playing more, if BR3-4 was a thing, and BR 5 a thing
But iam not going to play, BR 3-4, as i refuse to play BR5, with BR3