Then use the lee-enfield sniper, you always have more ammo than your counter sniper.
Problem solved.
So the 2 more rounds on G41 justifies 2s longer reload & less dmg ?
Because of 2 rounds ?
i already told you about the br 4 sniper and rifle. stop being ignorant. you do this with everything. you try to talk about tank addition viability when you only have 3 hours in wt and no knowledge of vehicle stats. this is basically the same thing when u ask for evidence we give you evidence and you choose to ignore evidence cuz it doesnt fit with ur opinioon
Then use the lee-enfield sniper, you always have more ammo than your counter sniper.
Problem solved.
So the 2 more rounds on G41 justifies 2s longer reload ?
Because of 2 rounds ?
so i should match a 10 round bolt action against a 10 round semi auto
that a loads slower, b fires slower and both down in one hit
no i agree the g41 needs major buffs
and the us need a br4 rifle, br4 sniper and a real br4 mg
no because 2 more rounds and a gun that loads 25 and nearly 50 percent faster
again them being a br higher would not matter if br4 and br5 were separated
the g43 reloads faster with a bigger magazine
if the garand had the same stat advantage it would have a 13 round magazine and reload in 2.1 seconds
it be at br4 and the g43 would be at br3 but id be willing to make that trade.
Well if you struggle with the 8 rounds id say yes, your best bet is to stay away everywhere where you might encounter enemy and stay at range where you have the advantage.
Hence the sniper lee-enfield.
Which you also mentioned as somekind of issue earlier, sniper.
But unfortunately, you only got the GL which most likely upon hit on squad kills probably more than 2 rounds.
and if the g43 gl was at br5 you would have a point or the gl garand was at br3 again a point
Well if you struggle with the 8 rounds id say yes,
8 vs 10 round and the gun with 8 rounds has the slower reload
Except there isnt G43 GL to start with.
And higher dmg and 2s faster reload than its BR3 counterpart.
Poor you having slighly inferior gun than opposite team has at BR4.
there is no g43 or g41 gl… besides the event fg42 gl america has the only semi auto grenade launchers
And higher dmg and 2s faster reload than its BR3 counterpart.
Poor you having slighly inferior gun than opposite team has at BR4.
Reply
Kriegerfaust007-live
there is no g43 or g41 gl… besides the event fg42 gl america has the only semi auto grenade launcher
ok first because the allies dont have a br4 rifle and you want to sperate br4 and 5 making all br4 weapons effectively br3
so until we get br-+0 it wont work
i admit i am wrong the one thing the allies have the axis does not
the axis need a g41 with a grenade launcher history be dammed
and not add a g43 until the us gets a real br4 semi auto and that gets a gl
and the allies need a br4 rifle, sniper, and mg
Except there still is the GL gayrand at BR4.
Except the lee-enfield at BR3 is arguably the best sniper all the way to BR4 regardless how entirely useless this class is.
Well I cant really help with the MG issue either.
Which is also rather useless class on the game.
america does have a br 4 rifle u einstein. the gun weve been talking about. there are still br 4 flamethrower, tanks, planes, smg, mg, and launchers. yet apparently its impossible to play br 4 america. and i asked for nerfing br 5 select fires and jets to make br 4 more popular among other things. not ± 0 mm
i admit i am wrong the one thing the allies have the axis does not
the axis need a g41 with a grenade launcher history be dammed
and not add a g43 until the us gets a real br4 semi auto and that gets a gl
there are still br 4 flamethrower, tanks, planes, smg, mg, and launchers
not everyone uses rife grenades
the br4 allied mg is garbage
smg finaly good
flame throwers not my thing
launcher is the german weapon every wheeraboo wants removed
from everybody but the axis
planes yeah but not for f2p that bring a tank
tank either great armor and a garbage gun
or great gun and garbage armor
yes i know what you are asking for but allies need a functioning br4 before that can happen
they already have a functioning br 4 u numb skull. theres content. theres competive gear. you dont need both a compeitive mg and smg to be competiive . as long as you have a competiive automatic ur good
Yeah, havent seen any other topics lately than nerf GL garand.
ok list a br4 rifle thats not a gl
a br4 sniper
a br4 mg thats not the broken johnson
“list a br 4 rifle thats not the br 4 rifle”
m1 c garand
“list a br 4 mg that isnt the br 4 mg” but no problem: 1919a4 mg
If these 2 obsole classes is your only issue regarding the topics subject im pretty sure we’re good to lock br5.
or to make br 4 playable by nerfing select fires and jets
Sure, doubt it will ever happen.
Much like I dont have high expectations for locking BR5 either.
But locking BR5 hardly harms anyone, bit longer que times at most.
Issue is it’s a bandaid patch that doesn’t fix the problems that br 5 has. Select fires and jets are too strong for br 5 as they are now.
Basically this