That’s what I said, +/- 0 BR matchmaking would have each BR only fighting itself, no uptier/downtiers
downsides: more br 1 seal clubbing. dead queues, longer queue time
Yeah the garand vs g43 is so bad!!! It’s not like literally the only difference is 2 rounds.
and a reload of 3.1 seconds vs 2.5 second
and surprise the 3.1 seconds is the garand and not the g43
if they had the same reload or the g43 was worse
then yes it would be the same or negligible difference
the zh29 is even worse at 2.1 seconds
and of course 8 vs ten rounds
every 60 seconds 160 rounds
every 60 seconds 240 rounds 150%
every 60 seconds 300 rounds 200%
yes the thompson 50 rounds was a big help]
the johson buff is just rubbing salt into the wound
Garand is 2.9, even in game.
While G43 2.3 & ZH is 2.1
All while being 1 tier higher than garand.
BR3 -/- BR4
Does these freedom time units also take in account that BR4 gayrand has grenade launcher ?
1 Like
garand has same damage and better recoil
which matters until br4 is separated from br5
us does not have a br4 rifle, sniper, ora br4 mg worth its rank
if br4 is separated from br5 it means br4 would almost always be facing br3
so yes as it is things are acceptable, separating br4 from 5 would destroy br4 and br3 us / german gameplay
So 0.6s / 0.9s reload differency is fine if BR5 wont be locked or what exactly are you trying to mumble here ?
Looks like gayrand with GL is BR4
And you are now afraid that you cant compete with GL gayrand against Gaywehr ?
they have the highest damaging semi auto sniper in the game at br 4. They have a high damage semi auto with a grenade launcher. no other nation has that. and the mg has the highest mobility in the game for a mg plus 990 rof and a quick reload and buffed recoil. ur defense isnt good
She just keeps complaining that Germany has better or exclusive things and cries. But mention this to her and she’ll tell you it’s useless.He only stops talking about "equality"when it suits him.For him, the balance of power means that the Allies have artificial advantages and the Germans are at rock bottom.
highest damage semi auto snipe
quick question, how many body hits does it take for a down or a kill
having a higher number is a difference if the number above is the same
having the highest damage semi auto grenade Laucher see the answer above
highest mobility, 990 rate of fire, quick reload, recoil buff,
because it has slightly more than a quarter of the magazine size
900 base is impressive if the 34 was not 800 and the 42 900
second a high rate of fire is a detriment to a low capacity gun
and the johnson 34 and 42 all have 12 base damage
a great reload if it was not a 20 round magazine
She just keeps complaining that Germany has better or exclusive things and cries. But mention this to her and she’ll tell you it’s useless.He only stops talking about "equality"when it suits him.For him, the balance of power means that the Allies have artificial advantages and the Germans are at rock bottom.
if you mean me i am glad you think i am a hermaphrodite
because almost every
a wants to downtier axis gear
if not that buffing axis gear
almost no one wants to uptier axis gear
if not that power creeping axis gear by adding stronger weapons
if anyone did that for the allies id complain less
May I also ask a quick question, how many games have you recently lost due to this outrageous differency of sniper garand vs gewehr ?
it has a greater 1 shot range. range is important for a sniper. no other nation has a tech tree semi auto with gl buddy. i just wanted to mention its also high damage aka one shot compared to the m1 carbine with gl. And you cant just discount it having the highest mobility in the game as that is the second most important stat for a mg besides aimed down moving dispersion.
At a certain point when you keep backtracking when ur argument is built with the assumption that multiple things are true u just have to concede ur wrong
ill answer that after you answer how many wheeraboo wine about the g41 or demand the g43 is put in br3
Ah yes because the G41’s almost 5s reload is comparable to issue on hand 2.1 & 2.6 vs 2.9
Also less dmg than gayrand but thats just annoying little detail, lets focus in this extremely outrageous differency of 0.8 & 0.3 .
which is fair when you comparing a 50 round to a 20 round magazine 2.5 to one
not so much when you compare a 75 round to 1 20 round magazine or nearly 4 to one
and yes that be a great deal to have a longer range but not when you have a smaller magazine and a longer reload
cool man. still didnt address the thing that dismantled the majority of ur argument. br 2 russia doesnt have a good mg. they still have the best br 2. you can have a few weaker weapons and still be competitive
yews the famous 10 round garand
or the even more famous 8 round zh29 and g43
combine a bigger magazine and a faster reload and yes there is a reason there not in the same br
the trouble is the allies have no rifle in br4 save the grenade launcher which is a g43 for the germans which is still better than the garand
wow br2 russia lacks one good br2 infantry weapon
while the us only has one good br4 weapon the 50 round thompson
br4 rifle does not exist
br4 sniper does not exist
br4 mg garbage