No BRV fighter should face BR2 AA.
BR2 AA kills everything though. If you can’t, it’s because of skill.
You seriously want to squish 5 BRs worth of fighters into 3? How much slog do you want there to be without moving up in BRs?
Do you have a really good reason for that to not be the case?
Should we space out gear just to fill a BR?
I’d argue that’s the man problem with the entire Japanese tech tree. They spaced stuff out just to make it seem deeper than any of it really is.
The fact that aside from a singular example in each tree it works perfectly? There is no reason to change anything without Jets.
The Japanese tech tree doesn’t have anything because there’s nothing to have, Japan never developed anything to put there because they were entirely focused on fighting the war with a largely non industrialised nation. That’s not the same as taking what works perfectly fine and squishing it down unnecessarily,
Exactly. There almost is no reason to change anything without jets.
But since we have them, every other aircraft needs to be reevaluated.
And everything you say about Japan is right. And yet they have more BRV fighters than Russia. That’s absolutely crazy. Done solely to stretch out the Japanese tech tree.
Squishing it all down will just give everything that’s stuck in the shadows of jets a place to actually fly and compete.
By casting everything else in shade. BRV Planes in BRIII require BRIII planes to be moved down or left to rot. If they’re moved down BRII planes require the same thing, and all BRI planes would be abandoned. How is that any better than what is currently happening with Jets?
Why would those need to be pushed back? Why do feel this need to space everything out?
The differences between most BR3 and BR5 fighters is negligible (suspended armaments excluded)
Do the difference between the La-5FN v the La-7 justify the 3 v 5 difference?
You want 2 regular BRs, a slog comprised of 3 BRs and two empty BRs? That’s worse than all empty ones.
Would certainly be more balanced and versatile than what is currently offered.
Who cares if a some BRs are left mostly empty.
BR2 has more rifles than any other BR. Should we superficially space those out too?
All we ever really needed was 3 BRs anyways.
Early, mid and late war. But now with certain additions, a 4th post war/experimental is required.
Either they add BR6 and move jets there - or they massively nerf jets payload and turn rates.
I really dont understand why this is the case, BR3 is popular - there are enough players there for a BR3/BR4 MM, yet I also very rarely get non BR5 matches.
Its very convenient for Soviets to bring KV1 - a tank which is disgusting in low BR, while being pathetic in BR4. Why bring T34 57 or KV2 when you never have to deal with BR4 vehicles.
1 Like
Won’t happen, as Korean war is already planned content for WT’s infantry mode.
With ±1 MM still being a thing, BR6 wouldn’t solve anything. It would only relocate the problem.
Instead of BR4 being the least popular BR, BR5 would take its place. Instead of BR4 props suffering, BR5 props would suffer.
Just overall terrible take from people who are not really interested in playing high BRs.
hey man, be nice!
I know I am a communist who wants all your veteran stuff, but at least be nice to people
You are obviously butt hurt, to the point you have need to spam off topic nonsense.
be careful there fella, I might nationalise all your vet stuff - ooooh there’s a scary ghost coming for your SPAA truck - the ghost of Stalin