BR suggestion and animation fixing

Archive Suggestions - Archive
1

Hi everyone.

First of all I want to start by saying that I dont know if these suggestions have already been said or if the problems I will be listing are already known.

BR 3 shouldn’t be playing against BR 5 players. It is a terrible experience as the difference in equipment is gigantic, bolt action riffles against automatic rifles is fustrating same goes for vehicles (tinger II vs any BR 3 tank isn’t a fair fight). I think it discourages new players from playing the upper BRs. To resolve this issue I think the best thing to do is to change the layout of BR and instead of BR 1,2,3 playing on lower tiers maps and 3,4,5 playing on higher tiers make it so BR 1,2 are playing on low tiers maps, BR 2,3,4 on all maps and 4,5 on high tiers. This will have for consequence of separating the playerbase but since enlisted is coming to steam I dont think it will be noticable by players
I also think the game will be much more enjoyable for mid tiers players and another benefit is that it will allow more players to play on different maps as for now only BR 3 can play on all maps.

One last issue I want to share is with shotguns and some sniper rifles. The browning auto 5 and the Winchester model 1912 have an animation issue. When you reload while still having shells into your magazine your soldier will rechamber at the end of the reload even though there is already a round in the chamber.
There is an animation issue with sniper rifles that cant reload with stripper clips, when the rifle is emptied and you open the chamber to insert new rounds you can still see rounds in the magazine even though it is supposed to be empty. the rifles concerned about this issue are the springfield M1903A3, springfield M1903A1, Kar98 with scope mount and pre-war Kar98 with scope mount (the mosin M91/30 isn’t concerned).

Thank you for reading. I love enlisted and if this message is seen by devs, keep up the good work! And I am sorry if there are any mistakes or if my message appear to be cold but I English isn’t my first language.

2

T-28 in Berlin, Panther in Tunisia? No, thanks.

3

In my opinion 1-2, 3-4, and 5 would be better

4

maybe even 1-2, 2-3, 3-4, 4-5 as I don’t mind seeing 2 or 3 bots in my team as long as there is engouth real players.

5

In my opinion t5 should only fight t5. T5 has so many assault rifles and auto rifles that it barely feels ww2 and i dont want to fight against fake guns while using g43 or svt 40

6

Yeah, but it would be in fact just equivalent to 1, 2, 3 with ±0 MM.
With meta on queues 1 and 2 would make significant number of equipment pretty much obsolete.

7

But this means there’s no downside to playing 2 or 4, and no point in playing 1 or 3.

I’d say it should be either exactly your br, like the full lobby is 3.

Or since we don’t have enough players it should be 1-2, 2-3, 3-4, (4-5) options

1 Like
8

Seems like the best option and I also think it will be better than the current BR system in term of authenticity.

9

if it would be only your br it would ruin the variability. It would always be just stuart vs panzer 3 or panzer 4 vs t34. I would want t4 to be playable without having to fight alongside t5 and i would also want to play t1-2 without t3.

Even better system would be:
t 1-2 moscow, tunisia, pacific
t 3 stalingrad, normandy, ardennes, pacific
t 4 operation bagration, normandy, market garden, ardennes, pacific
t 5 Berlin, köln, ardennes, normandy