With the game adding things like the Ferdinand and Tiger 2 (H), i think its time to re visit the lower BR tanks for germany.
The Pz.Kpfw 3 M on BR 2 is in a nice place, as well as the J1, even if i think we rather need a L than a J1 in the game.
But the Pz.Kpfw 4 F2 isnt.
The “short” 75mm KwK40 L43 cannon is not good on BR 3, even having a hard time penning Shermans, and if you get uptierd to BR4, the tank is of no use.
The Pz.Kpfw 4 G atleast has 80mm hull armor, giving you a change to fight Sherman’s, KV-1’s etc, bc you have more time to aim for weak spots and better chance of surviving hits.
With the StuG 3 F being put on BR2, witch has the same gun and Armor, i think its time to change the BR of the Pz.Kpfw 4 F2
So what do you all think? Change the BR, or is there a reason tho not have the Pz.Kpfw 4 F2 as stop BR2 tank for germany, before getting the Pz.Kpfw 4 G on BR3.
[poll type=regular results=always chartType=bar]
2 Likes
StuG 3 F being put on BR2, the famous not tank destroyer with a turret
2 Likes
Ausf.F2, 7/BW Umbau (Sd.Kfz.161/1) Temporary designation for Ausf F chassis built with long 7.5 cm KwK 40 L/43 main gun, later renamed into Ausf. G and 8/BW.
please share the drugs with the class
pz4f short 75
Because the recoil length was too great for the tank’s turret, the recoil mechanism and chamber were shortened. This resulted in the 75-millimetre (2.95 in) KwK 40 L/43.[34] When the new KwK 40 was loaded
pzf2 long 75
The Ausf. F tanks that received the new, longer, KwK 40 L/43 gun were temporarily named Ausf. F2 (with the designation Sd.Kfz. 161/1)
Well, Panzer 4 F2 is not as good as Panzer 4 G or Panzer 4 H obviously but i think it’s not bad enough to be placed on BR 2. Does that make sense? It’s like T-28 and T-28E case. T-28 is obviously not as good as T-28E but it’s not bad enough to be placed on BR 1.
4 Likes
Short??? I mean its better to be humble than bragging but come on dude.
This is short
This is long
2 Likes
Just because it’s not the L46, try the M3 for size
