You may need to be more active in the forum. Stick around, reply to some posts, engage in the community, and the restriction should be lifted. It’s because you’re a new user, that’s why you can’t edit your posts or add a poll.
Thank you I will re-post with a poll when I can.
Feel free to provide feedback. If anyone has suggestions, I’ll include it in the post.
I.e. Tanks naturally balance out, but planes don’t. What should to cost/wait for planes be?
Damn bruh. Can’t you just make a poll for the nice newbie?
Guy put a lot of energy typing up a well written and well thought out post, which already got closed for the same reason even though he said he can’t. This one wasn’t as well written as the first, but damn. Give the guy a break and make him feel welcomed. This community kind of sucks and it’s a shame to see y’all basically blow off a nice and respectful newcomer.
1 Like
We’re not allowed to do so, as it could be construed as meddling, and cause issues among other users. The OP just needs to engage in the community a bit and the option will open up for them.
…
…fair enough. Thanks for the explanation.
2 Likes
You should copy your first post to reuse when you can make a poll. Here’s a link incase you need it.
I’ve had a similar concept in the past that would get rid of BRs. Instead of differing spawn times, each squad would get a point allowance for creation. Specialist and higher tier guns/gear cost more points. Basically you wouldn’t be allowed to bring fully automatic guns on every soldier. You’d have to pick and choose between a couple kitted out guys with the rest being basic, or a squad where everyone has mediocre gear type thing. Would make the field far more diverse, slow the game down a bit, make it feel a little more real.
That was similar thought I had. First I considered having the BR be the ticket cost for spawning the units. Then I considered the maps that don’t have a ticket cost, and thought a timer would be a much better solution there. The then the more I fiddled with the idea, the timer seemed more logical, as it creates a natural ebb and flow. This option would still allow players to fully load up on a squad if they want and wait the Req time, but that’s their choice, not forced onto them by the devs.
Last time we did, we discovered it was against TOS hahahahaha
Yes but dont worry he’s allowed to repost the topic, it wont count as a duplicate post or spam
This game is of no such sort. If you want to wait a minute after you die to play the game again then go play hell let loose.
I think it’s fair to say this game sits somewhere in the middle. I believe he was trying to convey that at times the lobbies are brain dead, and at others (when opposing team is full of good players) the only way to win is to outsmart them and/or take a more tactful approach (just running and gunning forward to the point won’t work). i don’t see him wanting to change things about the game that would make it hell let loose. Kind of disingenuous to say go play that for this suggestion.
Was thinking I’ve seen y’all do it before lol. Someone must of ratted and felt petty that day
Waiting extensive amount of time after you die is a core gameplay feature of hell let loose. It’s not disingenuous either as they want to slow down gameplay well play the game that is already slow and don’t try to ruin this one… HLL sucks for this exact reason so why you want to bring it to enlisted is beyond me.
Again. Not the vibe of this game… this is exactly what hell let loose is trying to do… enlisted is fast paced arcade shooter
which was even mentioned and why want to change that why? Because you can’t handle how fast it is? Well uh… play the game that rewards you for spending 30 minutes in a bush with an mg42.
Or… considering the fact you don’t like autos on everyone just stay out of brv… prime example of what i always repeat you don’t even value the charm of 5 and instead are trying to make the whole game different entirely only to satisfy your slow paced dream… just stay out of br4+ dude. simple. quit trying to ruin the game.
even the guys who don’t like auto rifles make actually valuable suggestions about nerfing them… this is trying to conventionally change the game for what? To incentivize using low br stuff in high br games? Or what? Get rid of the br system? I don’t want to play with new player timmy with all my 5 stuff.
why should timmy with bottom of the barrel stuff have an easier playing the game than me? Why are you trying to create passive nerfs and buffs? The balancing is the BR system.
this “balancing” is purely off of time spent? wtf?
Why should using stuff that i SPENT TIME to unlock make it so i have to SPEND MORE TIME to use said stuff? Answer, i shouldn’t!
Going to chalk this up as a 3rd desperate attempt to nerf BRV rifleman squads after being slapped in the face when you try to make the guns quote unusable. Keep trying.
There is a plethora of differences between these two games. Changing a couple small mechanics does not magically make this game like it. You can simply disagree with the suggestion than to say “go play this game that’s completely different from enlisted”. He obviously likes the core gameplay here or else he wouldn’t be playing enlisted. There are many people who feel the game could use some changes. I too would prefer a little slower/more diverse battlefield (this doesn’t mean spending 30 minutes in a bush). Not to the point of making it a sim like HLL, but more or less of what we used to have in low tier matches. Which have just become copies of high tier matches now-a-days for the most part. It’s so incredibly boring using the same stuff over and over, and everyone else using the same stuff as you. Most of my issues with it, is i end up having to carry the whole team most of the time. I don’t always want to play the meta and strain my eyeballs/brain playing every role as fast as i can to stand a chance. I’ve always been a supporter of lobby balancing, and slowing the game down. What that looks like i don’t really have a say. Just know i would enjoy a little slower game play. It’s also dumb when a match ends in 5-7 minutes with no exp. The game has without a doubt become faster paced since i started playing over 2 years ago. It almost feels like a completely different game. Power creep is very real here. So should i tell you to go play call of duty for liking faster game play and the game should revert back to how it was before? That’s an asshole response. I guarantee you’ve had suggestions for the game that not everyone agrees with. Don’t be the ass. Just disagree.
Enlisted has drawn it’s players by being in the middle ground of different game elements. It’s not truly one thing or another. Most importantly, the game isn’t going to change because of one opinion on the forum. No need to get upset and belittle.
So surely the best idea is to tip it towards one side where another game already does it fine.
A simple game mechanic is not going to tip it to one side. There would have to be many quite severe changes for that to happen. Either way. You’ve made your point, we can move on. Thankfully the devs have their own vision for the game and it doesn’t really matter what a player’s opinion is.
Simple game mechanic involves overwriting the entire BR system to spawn times? Why do you think you’re entitled to make people spend more time NOT playing the game by waiting in menu for longer?
I guess you forget that just about a year ago the game didn’t have a BR system lol. Did enlisted still stay enlisted by changing something so drastic then? Were the people responsible for that change “entitled”? There’s bound to be players who prefer not having a BR system like how it used to be. I don’t know why someone’s opinion bothers you so much. It’s not like guy owns the company and can implement his wishes. He’s just sharing a concept, it’s not entitlement. This is why people hate the forum. It’s so incredibly toxic here, i find my own blood pressure goes up within minutes of checking in after disappearing for months. Seriously, you can move on. Stop arguing to argue. Opinions are like assholes. Everyone has one.