There is a plethora of differences between these two games. Changing a couple small mechanics does not magically make this game like it. You can simply disagree with the suggestion than to say “go play this game that’s completely different from enlisted”. He obviously likes the core gameplay here or else he wouldn’t be playing enlisted. There are many people who feel the game could use some changes. I too would prefer a little slower/more diverse battlefield (this doesn’t mean spending 30 minutes in a bush). Not to the point of making it a sim like HLL, but more or less of what we used to have in low tier matches. Which have just become copies of high tier matches now-a-days for the most part. It’s so incredibly boring using the same stuff over and over, and everyone else using the same stuff as you. Most of my issues with it, is i end up having to carry the whole team most of the time. I don’t always want to play the meta and strain my eyeballs/brain playing every role as fast as i can to stand a chance. I’ve always been a supporter of lobby balancing, and slowing the game down. What that looks like i don’t really have a say. Just know i would enjoy a little slower game play. It’s also dumb when a match ends in 5-7 minutes with no exp. The game has without a doubt become faster paced since i started playing over 2 years ago. It almost feels like a completely different game. Power creep is very real here. So should i tell you to go play call of duty for liking faster game play and the game should revert back to how it was before? That’s an asshole response. I guarantee you’ve had suggestions for the game that not everyone agrees with. Don’t be the ass. Just disagree.
Enlisted has drawn it’s players by being in the middle ground of different game elements. It’s not truly one thing or another. Most importantly, the game isn’t going to change because of one opinion on the forum. No need to get upset and belittle.