What point you dont have a point you point is ''I play the allies all the time so they must have everything best ‘’ You must see the entire picture if you tell me that Ki-100 in BR III is not same as Hurricane in BR I I dont know what to tell you go cry about the Xa-38 literally on every topic you are as allies bias as you can xD
No one takes you seriously …
Other nations have plenty of things that are better/best compared to u.s. just because i advocate for xa to stay br3 doesn’t mean I’m bias for u.s. It simply means i believe the xa should stay there
No one can take you seriously with your nonsense about how the ki isn’t an S tier plane in br3.
Ohh its not the only time do you honestly want me to show that every time you pick the allies side that’s why I’m making fun of you since its all the time there is not a single time you have given a non bias opinion.
Uh huh…sure. i guess my petition for fiat and 110g2 to be br3 is U.S. bias.
I guess my petition for ki-63 to be br3 and the zero to be br1 is U.S. bias?
I guess my petition for japan to get a good attacker in br3 is U.S. bias?
Grow the ef up
See I dont even need to say nothing and your colors are showing 
the list of equipment that should be br -1
Bm-8-24
Valentine
and perhaps with a stretch of the Su-76, but again, this is purely my personal opinion, and then I’m more inclined to believe that it has its own br deservedly, but here the effectiveness is different, of course, if you add a choice of ammunition, then 2 br reinforced concrete
Pz.Sfl.Ic
When I bought this baby, I kept It in the setup for a very long time along with the pz 2 flam. But then, after playing enough, he realized that he was already too weak for 2, and he had nothing to do against 3 at all.
StuG III A
a weak tank, with a very dubious bc, the armor is not wow, it breaks through calmly, and also an expensive prem tank, which I rolled out once after the purchase, perhaps the 1 br setup would be great in its current form.
if they change the armor-piercing to land mines, maybe it’s an iron 2 br, but so far I think it’s falling short.
Sd.Kfz.234/2
Pz.III J1
after playing on them, someone should go to 1 br from them, since the top 1 br technology there is weak in armor and weapons, to put it mildly, the land mines are not bad, but each of the two is good in its role
I’m personally in favor of cougar, but maybe someone won’t give up on J-1)
Ka-Chi
Chi-He
Ho-Ni I
do you need comments here?..
airplanes.
First, I’ll tell you what needs to be fixed.
it’s no secret that the USSR literally has the best flight in the game on 1 br, if not, just look at what all the fighters are carrying there with good performance characteristics, even a 37mm cannon is there)
perhaps you should replace the Yak-1 bombs with 2×50kg bombs instead of 100kg, and give the Yak-7b 2×100kg bombs, or leave it as it is.
of course, there is the bf-109 with 4×50 which = 2×100 but LTX and armament simply do not stand side by side, and one 100kg quietly covers 2-3 50kg Germans)
but most likely, nothing will be changed here, and everything is in its place. Fighters are replacing the attackеr
P-40E-1
FP-3
Boomerang Mk I
these three planes are terrible, I bought a boomerang and it crushed me for a while, until it was added to the sale Re.2001 CN…
then I realized that if this is added to 1 br, then the boomerang should be sent there, for the pre-setup of the British, it will go perfectly, and the minimum threshold of 1 br will help it become a little more popular, and so it is played at 3 is not bad, but this does not mean that it should be at 3))
P-40E-1 unlike the premium version, it does not deserve its 2 br, for 1 br as a fighter, it would be great.
FP-3 why not?
Bf 110 C-6
The principle is similar to that of LAGG-3-34
Bf 109 F-2
there are no differences from the f-1, so at first glance
Ju 87 B-2the Germans need an adequate attack aircraft, as for me, the protez is terrible
well, the JU-87 is a new blitzkrieg) a great top for 1 br for familiarization for a beginner, maybe it will help you learn how to dive faster
B5N2
A6M2 Reisen
D3A1
japanese… those who need to have a strong aviation and navy… Have the most terrible performance in the game)
I can safely send these three planes to 1 br and say that they will become much more useful there than they are now on 2 playing permanently against 3)
these planes don’t play fair against the USSR )
Well, the angry Americans are giving heat
all Japanese equipment in general can be safely given -1br, and holes can be covered with more modern equipment.
except ho-ri Kikki N1K2-J and Ki-84 ko
this 5 br 100%
and after that, 1 br will be great… maybe… for donors
Sure
Dont miss so much then and most likely he wont ever know.
Ironicly 99.99 % of my air kills are exactly potshots from behind rather than some extremely skilled dogfights that lasts for days.
But im sure you only experience dogfights.
Which murrica vs JP map doesnt have aircraft carriers ?
Just curious.
Well you can also use your speed advantage.
You have plenty time to turn around before KI is even near.
And thats exactly how the air battle is played majority of time.
I would understand if soviet mains cried about Ki-100 since they don’t have good payloads at BR III but the allies to cry about Ki-100 is just a bad joke. Literally they have the most event and premiums in the game and their TT options are not bad. But god forbids some one has something slightly better and like little kids they start to cry xD
everyone has their own chips, Soviet aviation has a small number of bombs, fighter jets, but they are often powerful, and attack aircraft have excellent carpet bombing, and in principle, the Soviet equivalent of the ki-100 is the Р-40, not irony, it will even be better in places
at the expense of allies, due to events and premium machines, they may be playing well, at least we know
Spitfire Mk Vc/trop
P-39Q-5
Spitfire LF Mk IS
which I play up to 5 br is quite interesting)
the problem with the ki-100 is that it is assigned a lot of tasks, although I believe that fighters should not have very strong bombs, but very evil AA weapons
but as I like to write, developers don’t want to go into details and nuances, releasing a general dump into the game.
For the soviets they can always put the I-185 (M-82) to BR III. The thing that bothers me is that I must buy premiums all the time instead of moving P-63 to BR III they copied the US P-39…
I would not be too happy with the I-185 On 3 br, since it is a trap aircraft, it was killed when they made a slide, like the Tu-2s.
By the way, the ki-100 now has the same slide as the FW-190
if you really want a fighter for 3 br, then the LA-7 may well become a good contender.
The problem with La-7 is that it has too good performance and its available to multiple squads so people like me will be running multiple La-7 aircraft in BR III xD that’s why I-185 is a better option.
there are undoubtedly advantages to this, but there are also disadvantages)
however, everyone will still remain of their opinion, but the LA-7 is in fact not so badly armed for 3 br, and the i-185 has almost 600 shells for shvak… And shvak is the most enjoyable 20mm in the game so far.
yes I-185 has good cannons but its like the FW while the La-7 is aircraft like Ki-84 Ko. So I’m not sure we can put J2M3 or Ki-84 Ko or La-7 to BR III. Maybe for BR IV they are OK but for BR III I’m not so sure. Normally its normal for Boom and Zoom aircrafts to have a lot of ammo but this dose not make them better La-7 is much better aircraft then I-185. Same way Ki-84 Ko is much better aircraft then Ki-100 despite Ki-100 having more ammo.
I prefer the option to move all fighter jets fighter 5 br to 4 br
Japanese aviation is a bit weak, as far as I’m concerned, it needs to be strengthened, it’s strange that they gave the G4M1 only 4 × 250 would give 6 bombs, and minus the br for the inferiority of this aircraft (objectively)
You mean non jet fighters since the jets should be BR V the props should be moved to BR IV ?
Yes, I’m sorry, my stupid translator)
That’s fine I got you xD yes all fighter props that are BR V should be BR IV some even BR III.
well, the skills of a pilot are already needed here, after all, they are not united by the characteristics of the aircraft alone)