Being useful at all would be a good place to be tho’
1 Like
In my book anything that’s iconic to WW2 is useful for a WW2 game
1 Like
Sure - in a game appropriate to it’s use.
I note your avatar suggests that even you have limits when it comes to things that are not actually appropriate to the setting of a game - why is this one any different?
I believe 1946 jets in Stalingrad ruin the WW2 setting, but Katyusha at Rzhev would add to it!
3 Likes
You realise they can’t actually hit something on the map right? From 1 side of it their minimum range will only hit 500m outside it - they CANNOT HIT ANYTHING IN THE MAP… so again, how do they add to the map or game?
By introducing a new function to the game for the dedicated rocket vehicles like bm8, panzerwerfer and then this where it’s a dedicated greyzone with resupply where you get out and wait… adding a reticle like big action to actually use it from range
And then teaching players that a plane is the solution to a tank where you’ll easily see the tracers of his rockets flying through the sky… this theory comes from big action.