Demolition mode isn’t even worth playing. I’ve played it several times, and every time (no matter whether I’m on the attacking or defending team) the defenders ALWAYS lose. And usually, it’s not even close, the defenders just get absolutely stomped. It really makes demolition mode not fun, and I’d rather just desert than play it. Maybe reduce or remove the reinforcements the attackers get for each demolition? Or maybe get rid of the mode entirely? I really like Enlisted as a whole, but demolition mode really sucks.
1 Like
there’s one map, Gavatu north I think; that begs to differ,
to put it simply it’s the easiest thing to defend imaginable, since it’s an inside hanger you’re not exposed to artillery, and you’re not exposed to mortars (much), there’s catwalks to shoot from and basically it acts like a big funnel that funnels the attackers into a perfect killzone.
1 Like
Actually, that’s the map I usually get, and the defenders lose every time. I’ve played as Japanese and Allies on that map. I agree that it is a great defense position, but the enemy typically swarms us from the sides and the rear and we can’t hold it.
1 Like
I would like the demolition mode to become a side objective in invasion, e.g. blow up an ammunition depot that somehow weakens the defenders.
Demolition mode itself is just a boring concept.
5 Likes
if we could have bigger, longer, matches there’d be so many interesting “side missions” that would be fun to see.
basically a gradient of “win/loss” where you can win “in name only” with all side objectives achieved by the enemy.
1 Like
Demolition is boring and was probably the most broken mode with faction capture bias as people could arm bombs in no time. It should be a side objective for Invasion, Assault and Conf to get additional tickets but otherwise the execution is too poor so far. Its good that this mode rately if ever appears now.
3 Likes