Bf 109 G-10 Moved To BR3, Maybe Add The Incediary Bomb Payload

[PrivateX0]

the only thing that made this BR4 material is its 30mm with the downside of having very limited quantity

also idk whats the damage difference between the regular 250kg bomb vs the 250 incediary bomb but i dont mind adding the incediary bomb as its payload to make this premium plane more premium.

if they add the bomb the overall speed of this place should be adjusted to fit this for BR3

• Yes
• No

[FauciKilledGma-live]

Downtier isn’t necessary… just give it a bomb.

[Conscript_Joe]

It’s one of the best prop fighter in the game… Even if I love the plane, even I think it would be intense in br3, which could face br2.

I’d give it a few 50kg bombs and it’d be fine at 4. Or a 250kg I guess…since the G6 is there.

[Bunnyla]

There was a post about this last year that got some good community participation. I agree with the general consensus that a single 250kg bomb would be a fair addition to the G-10 (and G-14) for balance purposes.

Adding payload to the BF 109 G10 and G14

poll poll The BF 109 G10 and G14 are both late war versions of the BF109, at BR4 and 5 respectfully, and while they have a nice array of guns, they also have no payload to speak of, which leads to them being quite a bit weaker than vehicles you can find at the same BR due to them being able to both engage planes and bomb, whereas the BF 109 Gs are near useless the second there isn’t an enemy plane in the air. To solve this issue, I propose keeping the gunpods, and giving them a small payload so …

For historical purposes, this configuration was probably unlikely. It’s my understanding that the centerline bomb rack and underwing 20mm cannon kits were two completely separate modifications that were meant to specialize the aircraft for either an interceptor or fighter-bomber role. Adding both to the airframe at once could significantly degrade the flight performance of what was intended to be an agile plane.