Best thing about this Event

Mess Room
21

It could be 3000 points instead of 500 pretty easily. :man_shrugging: I would not like to play infantry for that long when I am mood for vehicles.

I guess everything has to be just completely restricted nowadays. We can’t be just able to play what we want immediately.

I would probably quit this game it this game mechanic would show up. Another completely unneeded restrictions because some crybabies are just too lazy to destroy vehicles. (which is ultra easy currently)
Vehicles really aren’t superior to infantry currently. There’s literally no reason to punish vehicle players so harsh.

3 Likes
22

I guess everything has to be bland paste and avalable wihout any effort nowdays.

23

Doesn’t even make sense, troll.

If you would like to make it fair, everyone should start just with BA squads without engineers. Why infantry squads shouldn’t take effort to be able use actually effective units? Why just vehicles lol? Hypocrisy.

Forcing vehicles enjoyers to play something they doesn’t want to = fair.
Forcing infantry enjoyers to play against something they’d not like to = lame
I get your logic ig.

For example, in pacific everyone should just start with tanks. Because they’re way inferior to infantry there.
So why infantry enjoyers shouldn’t show some actuall effort before they’ll be able to take squads they’d like to.
Sounds pretty fair to me.

Selfishly crying about something you don’t like is so easy… That’s why bombing runs are complete waste of time currently. :slight_smile:

1 Like
24

Except if you want to penalize your own team

1 Like
25

Oh yes add that stuff so i will be able to spam vehicles as usual just after a short 15 kill streak with my Kurz, Conders, mp43/1 and brand new transfered mp717(r) while bad or average players won’t able to spawn their tanks to counter mine. Normandy will be even more fun with unkillable Tigers and Germans always winning at the first objective because murricans keep dying and can’t spawn tanks unless you play as a sniper to rack up kills, do you see how stupid and anti teamplay your change will be? Everyone will be camping as snipers instead doing objective because they want a tank or a bomber.
This is a casual game it shouldn’t limit tanks and planes, since they are already countered by each other. Are you going to limit rocket launchers and AT guns too? Because in many cases they are better than actual vehicles at killing tanks and infantry (in case of AT gun).

image

2 Likes
26

Actually imo all squads should have soft restrictions.
There is no sense in elite units being as common as militia.

But each time I suggest this players known for spaming meta say something about noobs suffering what is rather ironic.

27

Yeah, because restrictions are so fun in casual video games, thats exactly why I am playing games. To suffer shtts I don’t enjoy.

Enlisted shouldn’t be like that, that’s it. If you want so desperately elite unite to be rare etc, go play HLL and game like that. You can run with BA there 24/7. I want to enjoy easily accessible variety.

I guess you don’t even understand pure concept and bases of this game. That’s biggest issue here.

28

That’s why imo economy balance shouldn’t be connected with exp gain but rather it should have it’s own dedicated points that are generated over time.
Thanks to this all players will have equal chances.

29

That’s some wild nonsensical stuff here, some kind of modern communism I guess. It would surely work with f2p model and any kind of monetization.

30

Restriction always exists, currently has and will have whenever Df lauches the new meta system.

Rn restrictions are lower than devs advertise/ explain and looking at the success of the game, it certainly seems to be a good system

2 Likes
31

Maybe.
It’s just that I find “spam shit without any thought” rather boring in the long run.

Of course I understand it’s not what many ppl think or want. That’s why I also suggest to add a second gamemode that is a bit more “harsh” so ppl who want to have a break from “spam shit” gemeplay can enjoy something else.

A really insightfull comment.

2 Likes
32

Yeah, let’s split playerbase even more! That’s exactly what this game need. And you surely understand it very well.

What about not trying to change whole playstyle of this game? Is it too hard?

I just not understand why those loud few individuals want to completely undermine current gameplay and change into something completely different. It’s so annoying.

1 Like
33

Campaign merge will mitigate this problem.
Also according to some ppl noone will play this so there won’t be playerbase split :upside_down_face:

Looking at the great succes this game seemed to acheave, some changes are needed.
Maybe mine are too radical, maybe not. I can’t tell nor you can tell, we have to test it to see.

1 Like
34

Yeah, that’s true. Wasted resources and manpower in the end. And all of this just because few selfish trolls.

I guess it’s too hard to accept and support game as it is. :man_shrugging: You can develop your own game if you think your ideas are superior.

35

Based on “trust me bro”.
End of story.

2 Likes
36

No, hell no, that’s the War Thunder silver lion system and F that.

37

Learn to read.

Jesus.

I wrote several times that in battle economy should have no effect on the general economy.
Points you spend on spawning aren’t the same you use for progress and have 0 effect on it.

1 Like
38

skill/xp based spawning is not in best interest of the game. you would be creating artificial barriers so that only skilled players could use vehicles and low skilled (or new) players would use them rarely.

39

You can find the indecisive people on this forum. We can’t have a separate mode because it would split the player base, but going to Custom Games is a good idea because that is not splitting the player base somehow, though we shouldn’t have any say in the normal matchmaking due to the HA being a minority which no one likes to play with that ruleset so it’s doomed to fail with lack of players.

2 Likes
40

At least you can self-reflect.