Battle Rating Six? (BR6?)

This post was flagged by the community and is temporarily hidden.

4 Likes

Sure, but it would lengthen BR ~5 wait times.

I think it would be much better to just make BR V not able to fight BR IV

2 Likes

Why not just have option of BR’s facing off against their.own BR’s? Would save a.lot of cross-BR arguments xxx

3 Likes

I completely agree and I’ve been saying this for a while

2 Likes

The gap between BR4 and BR5 cannot be resolved by adding BR6. BR is just an artificial classification method. Essentially, the current semi-automatic weapons cannot compete with fully automatic ones. Therefore, my opinion remains that BR5 should have independent matching.

2 Likes

It can most definitely be resolved

image
Dev’s will say their isn’t enough players
for another BR level.

True, Im barely able to do something meaningful in game with BR I gear when playing against BR II for example. Cant imagine how it could be like for under equipped new players

As long as there’s not ±0 MM, adding yet another BR is just counterproductive nonsense.

4 Likes

Well that’s just wrong

Yeah, i can see that but things like the Tiger II and Tiger E shouldn’t be in the same tier.

Have you seen EVO’s video on how big the playerbase actually is? But i can see them taking the easy way of “there’s not enough players”

1 Like

This is always the Gaijin go to line when players ask for 0/0 matchmaking, and I am sure it would be the line if players asked for more BR levels. Personally, I am not sure a BR6 is needed, if they just did some work to make BR4 more relevant, and that would be accomplished by a true 0/0 matchmaking. But, the Dev’s are going to do Dev things, and that does not include considering a lot of the player requests.