This post was flagged by the community and is temporarily hidden.
1 Like
And in return all factions had bigger magazines in TT. We all know that the main meta in BR5 is SFs and how much this affected the balance of the game.
I’m sure this was mostly a resource issue. If you look at the magazine model in the game, you’ll notice that it’s a single-row magazine. So changing the magazine requires changing the model. You know how hard it is for our lazy developers, so you’d better do something more logical. Like requesting to move it to BR4.
Are you familiar with something called muzzle velocity? This is how Thompsons are balanced. The higher damage makes them great at close range, but at long range the damage drop and low muzzle velocity make them pathetic.
It’s clear that you’re either taking sides, or you didn’t really play with them. You can even tell from the stats that the La7 is a BR3-4 aircraft. It’s very similar to the Fiat.
The SU 9 flies very badly. And it also doesn’t have a 30mm auto cannon like the me262.
1 Like
And did you see anything similar in your own messages? No. That user is toxic and does nothing but cry. I wonder how he hasn’t been kicked from the forum yet. Of course, I don’t care, these things can’t bother me.
1 Like
can we all maybe calm down in the ‘Soviet bais’ debate. Are Soviets better on high BR? Arguably yes in the infantry department, but the difference aint that big. I play both factions, with planes, tanks and infantry, and to be honest, the decisive factor is who shoots first on high BR, not the one with 1.2 extra damage. I think many German mains are playing the victim way to much, acting as if someone has been killed by a pro-Soviet developer or something. I completely agree 20-25 rounds scotti, but find it very hard to support this when I am surounded by people who act so irrational (not to say you specifically, just in general).
(On a sidenote, who ever is censoring Greyparrots, if you want his side of the argument to loose then keep him around if anything. Censoring only makes the forum more toxic and makes the victom complex even worse. Just let him speak.)
2 Likes
This post was flagged by the community and is temporarily hidden.
This post was flagged by the community and is temporarily hidden.
1 Like
All German SFs are still with 20 rounds. ARs are with max 30 rounds. So nothing have changed because of some limited weapons. MGs got larger mags but it’s mostly not related as people always wanted large mag MGs and were asking about it for years.
Haven’t stopped DF from giving Stinger unrealistic ammo count. And BR4 are a punching bag of BR5 so it won’t change anything weak weapon will still be weak.
Muzzle velocity doesn’t matter on the most BR5 Soviet maps as you will be always be near enemies anyway. For USA it’s a bit worse but since you can land anywhere that cons is gone. You still deal more dmg with worse muzzle velocity than weak Conders. So you are wrong about it.
La7 has 2x 20mm that’s why it’s a better plane. It’s not the best plane in the game but thanks to overall stats and it’s armament is good enough to beat German planes and also destroy tank or apc.
Since when it flies badly? It doesn’t bobble around randomly like Me264 and can actually go up while Me262 always crashes. It’s fine that it doesn’t have 30mm we have much superior cannons against planes. 500kg bomb is more than enough to destroy infantry and tanks.
5 Likes
We are not taking sides here we just want a competitive game instead of 1 sided slaughters and for pros not casual players which is the majority of enlisted but we still want to actually have proper matches.
2 Likes
The in-game model is not a source of information for the weapon itself.
1 Like
Speak for yourself.
I like the fact that Enlisted is a casual-oriented game. I consider myself a casual in context of FPS games. FPS games are definitely not my main focus.
If you want to play a competitive FPS game, there are plenty of them. Definitely a lot more than the casual-oriented ones.
Stop trying to turn Enlisted into something it is not, neglecting the majority of its playerbase.
4 Likes
If that is true then why do the Soviets and the allies have what they have because it seems very one sided if you look at it.
And no this game was tactical in the past but it converted into this filth
Yes, 20, while the Soviets had 15, and many here said that was enough for them.
Stinger is overrated, personally I would rather give it a real site and reduce its magazine to 100 instead.
Many battles in Stalingrad take place at long range.
It’s definitely significantly worse than the rest of the BR5 planes. Something like the BF 109K is much more powerful. Of course, we all know that even BR2 planes can be used in BR5, but it’s a question of performance.
It turn badly. Although it is certainly not being unbalanced as the Meteor vs Me262, I still believe it flies worse than the Me262. Also, the 30mm caliber is as effective as a few small rockets.
The whole point of Soviet bias is not necessarily that Soivet is the strongest faction but the favoritism toward one particular faction. 1.2 extra damage is actual important, but only against Soviet, because of the existance of body armor. However, if you are on this forum long enough, you will know some “soviet mains” have been bitching about 6.7 vs 6.8 smg damage since the begining of time.
Just look at BR5, AS44 is a better Stg44, Tu2 is a better Ju188. Su9 drifting bug is fixed instantly but fw190 still bugged to this day. AT40 is ultra-buffed but Horn Stg is still utter trash. Fedorov rifle 1100 rof compared with G43k. Does it really affect winrate? No, becuase the side with more stacks will always win and tryhard will always use the same competitive lineup. But it just doesn’t feel right. I just want more toys to play with, but there is very little meaningful addition for Germany BR5 for the past few years. It is always the same FG422 and Tiger 2(H) spam. Also, let’s not forget that Soviet still hold monoply over m3 halftrack, Valentine, and Lewis machine gun.
5 Likes
You can’t put 9 MG42s on a squad ._. and if we follow this logic of whatever if a soldier looks like a German one this gun is useless bruh
Maybe i Made this statement a little bit wrong i was reffering to the fact that if the bullet is kinda slow maybe You can land your shoots to a moving enemy by moving your sigths foward to the rigth or left and make a quick aproximación of where the bullet is gonna be when enemy pass?
And if You need to sit to calculate the bullets drop on a videogame ._. no words at this point
If i we’re fully a German Main i wouldnt agree on adding the T44 100 the AVT-40 20 along other stuff aswell
2 Likes
I’m never a fan of one sided battels, they take away the fun of the game. But you’re clearly taking sides and speaking illogically.
3 Likes
With all those advantages right there the Germans don’t seem to be getting weaker but the Soviets are which is the problem and the reason they’re getting weak is because of how broken their stuff is to begin with which does not retain any competitive players for them so they’ll be stuck in this infinite cycle of losing players unless they actually address things properly.
If I had it my way I would have mirrored everything but no one wants my universe
he´s reffering to a fair and equal game where both teams are equal at least on weapons, a game cant be balanced cuz is casual not competitive??? thats peak nonsense
A Casual game must be fun for everyone not just 1 side
1 Like
How? The core gameplay has barely changed
“Balanced” and “competitive” are completely different words with distinctly different meanings.
Not to mention. Trying to balance out TT content with very limited BP weapon is pure nonsense. And he knows it.
1 Like